Post
Topic
Board Speculation
Merits 1 from 1 user
Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion
by
JayJuanGee
on 30/12/2023, 17:53:24 UTC
⭐ Merited by xhomerx10 (1)
Although I am not always active like you but I am not a new, I have learned a lot for more than 1 year, I want to learn more, so I want us all to discuss together and not get into any arguments with you.
Can I know the purpose of punching me?
I'm sorry I don't understand your question.
I didn't understand either and I didn't see any punching but just to reiterate the gentleman's rules of engagement here on the WO (in universally-understandable graphic format):
 
I think that Roger that got you guys on this one.

If Ambatman says, "Roger that," and then a guy name Roger says "why you punching me".. then there's gotta be a reason, no?

probably batman (or perhaps batboy?) needs to slappening both ambatman and am homer... just for funzies.

Just saying...


 Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy
poor robin.. or might I say poor roger.. taking so much punishening on this one. .    Cry Cry Cry Cry
Please, call me pm homer as I'm not much of a morning person.  

hahahaha

I should have put it into quotes, but I did not want to be too obvious in my attempts at punnening.

I saw "Roger that" and I did compare it with the handle "Roggeredek" and since I couldn't find any other reference looking back, I assumed Roggeredek was referring to that as the punch but I've never seen the term "punching" used in that way before - "paging" maybe?  

I kind of read it as "why you coming at me like that?" so a non-native english speaker might not figure out exactly the way those kinds of ideas (or jokes) might be better understood in English, so he may have been approximating some expression from his own culture/language and trying to use that in English.

Anyway,  I was stuck in my computer room because my youngest daughter had some friends over making a video for a school presentation

Admit it.

She is a tik tok influencer wannabe.

hahahahaha

and I was supposed to stay out of the way and yet be available to shuttle everyone home

Yeah.. "embarassing" having dad hang out too much in the area.

so I made a loosely related graphic.  Sad but true.  I did manage to get a cameo in the video though - I even got to say two words and I managed to do it in one take... which sucks when you're paid hourly.

Oh they "actually" let you participate, rather than your walking in and saying something like "oh shit?" and having that kind of an involuntary accepted into the final cut.

 Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy

Something like this:

   Shocked Shocked

The current #Bitcoin cycle looks very similar to the one in 2015, do you think we will follow a similar a path? 🤔

Source.

No.

[edited out................ ]
Dear Lord,
This entirely redefines the concept of bullishness..

Are you bullish enough?
$1M BTC sure hits, but I'm confused about in 2024.
Edit
No chance of that. $100k tops.

I get your possible waves idea that if we are at a certain point (which seems to be bouncing between right around $40k and $45k, then we may well not be in the right place to get 20x to 25x within a year.. but still the odds for $1 million in 2024 could not be zero. 

Let me see?  if I look at my December 2021 prediction, I can attempt to use that as a kind of guidance for what I had then considered to be possible at that point in the cycle, even though we are currently in a different part of the cycle.. including our momentum is in a different place.. so   $1 million by 2024.. gosh?  maybe I would put it at 1%-ish. or maybe less than 2%. but I am not going to put that at zero..

And, gosh $100k as a top?  That could happen by next week, so it is hard to agree with your proclamation that $100k would be the absolute top in 2024, so even if you might end up being right and have a stronger base case for the BTC price not going above $100k before the end of 2024, there are probably pretty decent odds that the BTC price could get above $100k in 2024.. maybe even as high as 15% to 20%, which is nothing to sneeze at... I would even be willing to bet, on one or both of these, if we could work out the right kinds of odds, especially since you are assigning zero odds to either scenario, which you seem to be wrong on both points, even if the odds are in your favor to end up getting it right, it is not zero odds, so in that regard, your proclamation is surely bettable if you might be ready, willing and/or able to agree to betting on one or both of your claims of zero odds.