Quote from: Game of Mages on January 03, 2024, 06:26:59 PM

Quote from: holydarkness on January 03, 2024, 05:42:16 PM

...instead of something like "2.5% to early investors" and "2.5% to team", or that you said,

If we had planned to do so, we would have written so.

Solana, marketing services, and time spent on development are all investments in the game that we are ready to accept in swap for tokens intended for early investors.

If you have something that can be useful to us, welcome, you can also become an early investor.

LMAO, you're an interesting one, aren't you? You continue on contradicting yourself. First you don't have an allocation for your team, and then you decided to share the early investors pre-sale token with the team because they are "early investors" [paid in time] upon being asked if the tokenomy changed, and after talking in circles, you said that it was the plan from the beginning, and now, when asked why doesn't it show dedicated allocation for team, you said as quoted above.

Quote from: Game of Mages on January 03, 2024, 06:26:59 PM

Quote from: holydarkness on January 03, 2024, 05:42:16 PM

And regarding the team, I assume that means the decision was made by the two full time employees? Or the part-time also has a vote?

I think we'll leave the process of making internal decisions outside the scope of this correspondence.

Actually, I'll beg to differ and say that the process of making decision of changing tokenomy shouldn't be internal or even happening at all. You ask for a funding here through token sale, it is very unethical to change your business proposal, the one that people use as one of their consideration to invest in your project by buying your token, unilaterally through your internal team's decision, i.e. because you deemed it fit. It doesn't evoke much confidence at all, does it? If it has to happen, it should be through your community agreement.