Quote from: GatorJMT on April 22, 2014, 08:43:17 PM

Quote from: Amph on April 22, 2014, 08:37:21 PM

Quote from: GatorJMT on April 22, 2014, 08:35:01 PM

Quote from: Amph on April 22, 2014, 08:28:55 PM

Quote from: GatorJMT on April 22, 2014, 08:21:00 PM

Quote from: Amph on April 22, 2014, 08:17:26 PM

Quote from: staffly on April 22, 2014, 08:14:55 PM

Mintpal added Communitycoin, a scamcoin where the developer kept 100-200million (or a lot more) coin just for himself...
I'm curious what idiots will buy that scamcoin.

do you even read? last wallet client

2)Fixes by Adriano for blocking transactions from lost wallet

The lost wallet likely only existed as a smokescreen for the Dev to delay distribution/accounting for distribution as he dumps parcel after parcel of shares lining his pockets. And there was no fix, there was a workaround that leaves 200 million coins hanging above the head of this coin for infinity.

you know, you should backup your statement, or you will be only seen as a troll

My statement about the lost wallet in this case was only a best guess to rationalize how such gross incompetence could occur, my guess, and it is backed up by the complete lack of transparency in the distribution is the Dev did it intentionally to distract from his true objective. Kinda like a "Look over there!!" type of action.

I did not mean that to be read as a hard fact that I had concrete proof of, sorry for not making that distinction earlier.

sry but i hate people that can't backup their statement, without real proof, like who put a reg tag on your trust without any evidence, and only baseless accusation

You mean like the statement that this coin has been fairly distributed? Where is your real proof? Should every poster in the entire thread be negg'd and called a troll then.

I never presented my wallet theory as fact, the fact that you read it as such was due to a lack of comprehension on your part.

baseless accusation are useless man, if your statement aren't present as a fact, then just don't accuse and leave the thread in peace

and you know that the the burden of proof is on the accuser? apparently not