Quote from: bitmover on January 04, 2024, 07:02:24 PM

Quote from: bitmover on January 03, 2024, 03:37:29 PM

Quote from: WatChe on December 29, 2023, 07:43:14 AM

May be we can dark the colour of 200-Week MA line on main graph and bold it, so it looks more prominent.

Done!

Quote

It will also be good idea if there is zoom in and zoom out functionality in Graphs. Like Graphs are showing data from 2013 to 2023. If you can provide functionality that can allow us to see data for say last 5 years or 1 year only.

I will add buttons of 1M,6M,1Y, 2Y, 5Y, 10Y, ALL. It is in my TODO list.

Done! I decided to make a change and remove the brush chart (the smaller one below).

I think it was taking too long to render and was making the website too heavy.

It should be faster and lighter now!

The pages does seem to be faster now, and I like the time periods added and also the check box for log (as opposed to linear, right?).. Although even when I uncheck log, it still shows "log scale" in the description.

After you removed the "brush chart," I am not sure if it is possible to zoom now (into further back for example if I wanted to look at linear from 2010 to 2016, I cannot really see them very well on this chart and sometimes I might want to just pick any 4 year period or even shorter and then zoom in on it). Previously we could use that "brush chart" feature to zoom in on a particular historical price area. Could we add a link in order that the brush chart could still be present and allow zooming on another page and even go between linear and logarithmic or maybe in a pop-up window? I am thinking that sometimes it could be handy to compare various dates or to zoom in on various periods, even if such functionality might not be within the initial loading page.

Quote from: bitmover on January 04, 2024, 07:02:24 PM

https://bitcoindata.science/withdrawal-strategy
Tell me what you think!

Ok.. Let me give a couple:

I'm thinking that there is some need for a couple points of clarity on the right output side.

1) From top to bottom.

As a title it says A) "Monthly Authorized Withdrawal" and then as a second title it says B) "Authorized Withdrawal" and then in the greyed output field it says C) "Authorized Withdrawal"

A) is o.k..

B) should be removed (because redunant)

and

C) should be amended to say "Authorized BTC Withdrawal" (will make more clear - user-friendly)

2) Below in the Advanced Withdrawal.. . in the output greyed field where it says: "Advanced Withdrawal" it should be amended to say "Advanced BTC Withdrawal" (will make more clear - user-friendly)

Quote from: UchihaSarada on January 07, 2024, 09:56:00 AM

Quote from: bitmover on January 04, 2024, 07:02:24 PM

Tell me what you think!

I like it!

I see the website description is JJG ....., which I think is not too bad but you can improve it.

JJG, what's this?
It's a good note for what JJG means. I see the reference link to Bitcointalk but a note for JJG is not bad.

Do you think so?

Personally, I think that the reference link that Bitmover put in there is enough.. and JJG would likely be a kind of branding or short-hand that need not be further explained, and we may well end up having a few more additional pages that have 1) a JJG rake model (with optional reinvestment projection) and 2) a JJG entry-level fuck you status chart (maybe change the name of that? I am not sure yet).

In other words, if you see various posts about JJG, then maybe we could put a link to a profile (but why?) or a link to some post that he (I) made (that also seems like a why?), but in the end, there might not be any need for a description that is more detailed than whatever substantive content is presented, since many of us in this forum are not necessarily seeking credibility by real-world credentials but perhaps to maintain some kind of pseudo-anonymous status which many members in the forum operate under such pseudo-nyms, including yours truly.

If you might be asking "what the fuck does JJG know that I don't know?" then, the answer may well be nothing.

Each of us has various ideas that we have developed over the years, and likely the end goals would be for the ideas to stand on their own and to be somewhat explained in the context of the website or the various posts in this thread or related threads, which concededly there likely are some ways in which the formulas for authorized withdrawal amount and advance withdrawal amount might be made more clear.