Quote from: legendbtc on Today at 03:29:47 PM

Quote from: Dewi Aries on January 16, 2024, 06:22:15 PM

Quote from: legendbtc on January 15, 2024, 02:34:15 PM

Actually, I don't need to analyze sports betting. Because the gambling sites did the analysis for me. I bet only by feeling and luck. Because the more I analyze, the more confused I become. I know that with careful analysis, the winning rate will increase, but for me, luck is the vital thing in this betting.
If someone is good at analysis, I will bet on that person. For me, time is limited, so I can only do this.

Yes maybe you are one of those people who really don't care what analysis is and just rely on luck, no problem and maybe some other gamblers also do the same thing even though they are involved in sports betting that basically you can do analysis based on the skills and knowledge you have to increase the percentage of winning chances to be closer. I don't think it's too confusing if you're knowledgeable and I would say that it's normal to feel confused if you're not knowledgeable about sports.

But yes I understand that in any type of gambling luck is still very important and cannot be replaced, even if you have very good skills but it absolutely cannot guarantee you to end up winning and that means luck is still needed. And this is why risk management is really important as a precautionary measure.

Yes, I admit that sometimes I have used knowledge for analysis to increase my winning rate. But I feel stupid for analyzing it. The result is just losing bets. I gave up analysis after those losses and bet according to a lucky strategy. Maybe I'm a lucky person. I'm currently fortunate in betting. I don't know how long I'll be lucky.
About risk management. I withdrew my winnings to avoid the risk of placing large bets myself. I consider losing matches to be an unlucky day. I will not try to continue playing to get back the lost money. My solution is to stop playing on those unlucky days. Let yourself listen to a song or watch an action movie.

Those analysis makes no changes; the game does determine who wins or not. looking at what happens in premier league, for instance, any team can win a match. Arteta was banned for saying what sounds like the truth, on why some teams win unexpected. That the system may have been corrupt. The analysis could be useful for gamblers who don't want to stake money without putting extra effort to make a strenuous process out of the prediction. So that they'll feel like they worked for it. Sometimes, in a match, Arsenal would look like the team to win, but before the game ends, they'll be losing out 2:0. Those games yield lots of wealth for the casino. As gamblers mainly go for big teams to win. They forget that football knows no big or small team. However, the big team do win. But it's not a permanent occurrence.

So, you're still on the right track if you don't invest time doing research and analysis yet win your games. It's an example that the analysis is overhyped. The results are not consistent. Most big analysts still make mistakes and people who follow their prediction still lose out big time in gambling. Analysis only helps the gambler to know the history of a team and how they've been performing with their opponent in the past. When Arsenal played with Luton town, a friend analyzed that since Arsenal has never won a game in the Luton town's stadium that they'll either lose or draw the game. I think it nearly happened, before the dying minute goal occurred. Although it looked like the game would end up being a draw. Hence, analysis works, but it's not the only means of winning in sport games. A gambler who can't analyze can also win.