Quote from: nutildah on Today at 01:54:47 AM

Quote from: JayJuanGee on January 15, 2024, 04:38:12 PM

Hopefully you have reported me to theymos in order that he can consider doing something about me being the supposed problem, as perceived by you.

Only you can fix the problem. But you obviously don't care... You will rank up the most useless multi-accounting scammers here if they kiss the center of your b-hole just right, because that is what matters to you most in your forum experience.

Again.. Your supposed perception of a problem, your supposed perception of what criteria needs to be followed to send smerits and your supposed perception of supposed ONLY solutions. You did not even point out the four members nor any of the supposed problematic posts, so how would any adjustments be made if some others, including yours truly don't even know the specifics? To me, you seem to be just trying to create work for others so that some of us might have to kowtow to some semblance of your smerit sending criteria.. when no such thing actually exists at the moment.. You cannot get theymos to do anything about it in terms of adjusting the smerit sending rules, so then you continue to just throw out vague accusations in regards to your own vision of smerit sending criteria.

Quote from: nutildah on Today at 01:54:47 AM

Quote from: JayJuanGee on January 15, 2024, 04:38:12 PM

Hopefully you are reporting campaign managers who you believe to be too loosey goosey with the posting requirements of their members.

"Reporting campaign managers?" You really don't have the first clue about how any of this works. There's no point in wasting any more time on you, so back on ignore you go. None of this is for you anyway, because as you've established, you don't care to change. Its for everyone else to see what's going on and why they shouldn't emulate your behavior.

Since you are proclaiming that you are not really even wanting to interact with me, then perhaps your goal is just to harass other members such as me, and then send messages to other members that you are going to harass them too.. so you are seeming to want to bully members into your criteria, and by the way, it does seems that some members do adjust some of their smerit sending criteria from time to time, including yours truly, but doing so merely because another member is whining about it and appealing to the public about it with such spin that he is not even pointing out specific posts and/or specific forum members engaged in the spamming seems problematic to me.. but no of course, I am somehow creating all of this problem because I am so generous, and you are even suggesting that I have some kind of bad intentions because I am not cooperating with your whining or that I am failing/refusing to do as much due diligence as what you believe needs to be done prior to sending smerits. Seems like a lot of assumptions, finger pointing and attempts to impose your own subjective criteria to merit sending coming from your end.

Quote from: nutildah on Today at 02:23:55 AM

Quote from: CryptopreneurBrainboss on Today at 01:59:15 AM

I don't usually count pictures been sent there as they're indicated on spreadsheet as denied post but to make things easier if the campaign continues all members will be requested not to engage on the thread.

Well, I don't want to tell people where they can or can't post.

Good! At least you are not that fucking stupid, and you realize that there are circumstances in which negative ramifications might result from your ongoing whining and harassing of mostly well-intended forum members.

Quote from: nutildah on Today at 02:23:55 AM

I just don't understand the purpose of counting their posts in places where their signature isn't shown. I realize their avatar is still shown. You don't have announce or change anything, but the whole purpose of disabling signatures in that thread is to deter spam posts there.

Yes, and we know that you would like to disable the sending of smerits in the WO thread too.. but instead, you decide to post about your issue in this particular thread that has my name in it.. which was kind-of, but not really an exaggeration of your earlier thread that was more supposedly focusing on smerit sending and bullying of smerit sending in the WO thread.. As you can see, you claimed victory in that earlier thread since you were able to conjure up 38 yes votes and you were also able to get one merit source member (El Duderino) to agree to try to move in the direction of kowtowing in your direction.

Quote from: nutildah on September 09, 2023, 10:34:30 AM

Poll has finally ended. 38 for Yes and 59 No. Not completely surprising, but for the 38 people who voted Yes, well let me just say I am proud of you.

There's been a considerable dropoff in merit farming in the WO since I opened this thread (although it still exists to a certain degree). I reckon I will re-open and bump it if it picks back up again.

At least Duderino seems like he's considering being more selective with merits, so that's good.

Just a reminder to all merit sources, you don't need to give away all your source merits! Ideally you are giving them out for good posts that demonstrate the slightest inkling of original thought, and not just for copy/pasted tweets about number going up, or because somebody expresses admiration for you or agrees with you. I dunno, I guess the takeaway is don't let yourself be so easily fooled and manipulated. Its happened to me a few times, nobody's perfect, but let's not consistently reward low effort copy/paste posts. It just leads to a multiplication of such posts in what is arguably the best thread on the forum.