Quote from: mega22 on Today at 06:06:49 PM

MEXC only confirms the listing once they are ready, so that could explain why they refused to confirm the pyrin listing. If Linda is a MEXC official, she will also not confirm. When will you stop lying?! Grin

Why was Pyrin forked just a few days after its release? Just accept that ASICS were active, and you fixed it, and since forked failed, you restarted it? Why is it so difficult to be transparent? I do not remember Bitcoin and Kaspa being restarted in the mainnet. Are you saying that urine is not in the mainnet? You haven't explained why GPU Miner was not released for days when there was clear evidence that someone(most probably a dev) was using GPU Miner. And you also haven't explained why the hash rate was so different between the dev GPU miner and Lolminer. Are your devs incompetent, or dishonest?

1. "I checked with MEXC, and they told me that they have never heard about the coin." If a MEXC official follows Pyrin, I suspect they have heard of Pyrin, right? Who is lying here? I can't speak for Linda, you said you checked with MEXC, so check with her. I can't do anything if she does not like to answer you. Just wait for the offical announcement, no?
2. If you have evidence that ASICS was mining, just share it here? There are many people who claim that they were ASIC mining. They have two things in common: 1. they are part of the Karlsen project + 2. they cannot share a wallet to prove it. It's would be so easy to prove, why don't you do it then?
3. I'm guessing you don't have a single proof of the GPU Miner, hashrarte or of anything either? So what are we doing here? Let's get back to work instead of talking about fantasies?

Why are you so obsessed with spreading nonsense about Pyrin? If you don't like Pyrin, just sell it, ignore it. move on.