Quote from: mega22 on January 17, 2024, 10:29:01 PM

LOL. The first GPU preferential mine happened after the public launch on Nov. 24th. The ASICS were active during the first week of Dec. The hard fork happened around Dec.7th after which the chain was stalled for 24-48 hours. What does sharing one tweet of Dec. 1st prove? Why don't you share a verifiable minutely hash rate from Nov. 24 to Dev 12. This is the period during which dev. did most of their preferential mining.

33% of the PYI blocks are red blocks as compared to less than 2% for Kaspa and Karlsen. I have never seen a dev who failed even after he copied the code. I have a high convicton that MEXC will refuse to list PYI after they realize the low quality of PYI dev work.

Aside from that. Shouldn't you Karlsen people stop your promotion tour and explain yourself?

- you pre-mined Karlsen before there was a single source on your website, twitter, bitcointalk available. your Twitter was created AFTER you already mined Karlsen. One day after you created your Twitter: https://twitter.com/karlsennetwork/status/1725537081697407130. At that time there was not a single word on discord about mining and Bitcointalk came 1 week later. And there was no single source of information anywhere? Please explain.
- why does your "whitepaper" not show anything about this premine?
- why does your "whitepaper" consist of 80% false tokenomics, and the remaining 20% is general word explanations, but you can't find anything technical.
- The same with your smart contract proposal, it is obvious that you do not bring the quality to develop smart contracts and are waiting to copy them from Pyrin or Karlsen
- why are you so extremely frustrated with Pyrin? Is your marketing strategy to accuse Pyrin of your own scammy tactics to distract from Karlsen?