Quote from: BlackHatCoiner on Today at 08:16:04 PM

Quote from: NotATether on Today at 11:11:04 AM

Shhhhh, its Samourai devs who are supposed to be morally repugnant.

For the sake of the discussion, I don't believe Samourai devs are saint either. I mean, they are orders of magnitude more trustworthy than Wasabi, and I'm a whirlpool user myself, but we frequently notice Samourai vs. Wasabi disputes which ruin the reputation of both.

Quote from: stompix on Today at 03:01:58 PM

I'm starting to think Kruw hated wasabi more than anyone here, there is no way someone could have done a better attack on their reputation than this one

Praising someone's death is undoubtedly one of the easiest ways to tarnish your reputation. However, there are numerous red flags associated with Wasabi's reputation. Even if you overlook Wasabi as an entity with all the falsehoods surrounding fungibility, address reuse, and the fact that zkSNACKs funds blockchain analysis, there's still a significant concern with Kruw himself serving as an alarm bell for Wasabi.

Deliberately disregarding every argument against Wasabi, resorting to whataboutism, and repeatedly using the same soundbites, accusing signature campaign participants of stealing users' coins without providing any evidence, believing that blacklisting in Bitcoin is sometimes necessary-- overall, his ethics seem to be a perplexing area.

Quote from: WhyFhy on Today at 05:53:38 PM

How is he a wasabi dev/team member?

He has public stated he is a Wasabi contributor. If you check his Github page, he has worked on Wasabi.

Aside from other issues with wasabi..(That I don't condone)

Contributing 7 Grammer commits hardly constitutes as a dev.

I don't know why he would even mention it.

https://github.com/zkSNACKs/WalletWasabi/commits?author=Kruwed&since=2024-01-01&until=2024-01-21

I'd bet that wasabi would back the bus over this dude 5 times.

Bet hey, it brought to my attention of other issues that I'm glad happened. It's unfortunate for the project as a whole.