Quote from: 0t3p0t on January 20, 2024, 08:31:17 AM

Well, PCSO just admitted that photo was intentionally edited for security purposes but the only problem here is that the editor seems too confident of what he did to that photo that draws the whole nations attention. It's like removing the background of the main photo and then changing it with another one. As a result it looks funny can create doubts. 😅

Yes, because the results of the editing have become a question mark and doubts for people, I also cannot accuse any official of being corrupt in this case because there is no complete evidence for the accusation, but for a big win, security is needed so that no crime is committed. experienced the winners, I was doubtful because of the OP but this shows the pros and cons also with the photo whether there are corrupt officials involved or not.

Quote from: dezoel on January 20, 2024, 07:24:02 PM

The winner might be covered already but editing it will make her identity more concealed. I'm no way of defending them but this issue alone is not a solid base to say that they are really corrupt. And I believe that not all governments who has access to money are corrupt.

Yes, that's true because this issue and the accusations are baseless, relying solely on photographic evidence, it's true that not all governments that have access to finance are corrupt countries, I agree with you that we can't make accusations from just one sided point of view, It could be true that the winnings are in accordance with PSCO procedures so that the winner's identity is kept secret to protect the winner's safety from criminal acts.

I think the background that was edited was the winner's house so they needed to edit it in a room, but it wasn't very attractive for other people to see, which ultimately raised a lot of doubts and question marks. then OP made it a topic of discussion here. but whatever it is, it comes back to each individual's view. Wink