Quote from: digitalbrass on June 29, 2014, 10:50:43 AM

I agree, If I do not recieve 100% of my inital investment I would like to see simon barber and his team do time in jail.

Old but still valid:

Quote from: Minor Miner on April 23, 2014, 03:29:33 PM

Quote from: kevin911 on April 23, 2014, 03:21:25 PM

Problem is actually raising the problem to the relevant authority, one case came close and was dismissed. To the point hashfast then boasted about it on their site, twitter and Facebook.
Legally wise they could be sitting on this datacenter without anyone knowing, raking in the money and when the time comes it will amount to a small fee that they can pay off with the equipment that we bought last year and they know this.
The justice system just seems to slow and nothing seems to be progressing with hashfast.
What we need to find out is what will it take to get hashfast to get their act together. They have no chance with credibility anymore but they do need to sort out what is actually going on.
7 more days until another failed delivery!

The case was not dismissed, a lawyer just replied to a criminal agency's inquiry. If you write to the AG and detail out your experience (and it is similar to others) where representatives of HashFast lied to induce your purchase (ie. they gave you a solid delivery date that the AG can prove was impossible) then it is fraud. They are now selling the chips that pre-orders paid for and not providing refunds. that can be considered fraud too. Include where you made the payment so the AG can demand that HF provide proof of where you money went after it was sent.
AND MOST IMPORTANTLY, you have NAMES to address your complaint at the AG's office to. The lawyers that sent the first inquiry were:

Public Inquiry Unit, Attention: Kimberly Christophersen, Lupe Zinzun, J. Bryan

These people are already familiar with HF and their lawyer's response so when more complaints come in telling a similar story, they will realize this is fraud and will push harder.