Quote from: Pmalek on January 30, 2024, 04:34:00 PM

I don't think so, and here is why. Nano X was the first wallet that received the Ledger Recover vulnerability and corresponding code. At the same time, Ledger announced that the Nano S Plus would be next. There was a lot of backlash and attacks on Ledger after that. That didn't make them change their mind, and a few days ago they added the Ledger Recover code to the Nano S Plus as well. Had they taken into consideration the community feedback and opinions, they wouldn't have done that, right? It's obviously not important to them.

The fact is, we will never know the truth, so, for the sake of our safety, it's better to assume that what I said is true. This is just a shady company and everything is expected from them, I still think that they intentionally didn't update the Nano S firmware to make people think that it still actually backs their words and promises.

Quote from: dkbit98 on January 30, 2024, 07:50:21 PM

Andreas Antonopoulos publicly said that many people contacted him and told they lost all coins by trying to be smart with their own complications.

People often forget that the higher the security, the higher the responsibilities become. When someone tries so hard to protect their seeds, it will be that hard to recover them too and even harder to keep them safely, especially when instead of one paper, you depend on many of them.