Quote from: terrific on January 31, 2024, 10:52:04 PM

We have to wait for that but it seems that the rumors are getting closer into the reality and that's why everyone who think that he'll traded will definitely going to trade him.
As for D'Lo, everyone has to move for trading him and that's likely the Lakers don't want him anymore of the roster and so with that, the LA is taking more care of Reaves instead of him and Rui.

It's always intriguing when trade rumors start gaining traction, and it seems like the speculation around the potential trade is becoming more substantial. The dynamics around D'Lo's situation are noteworthy, especially if the Lakers are considering moving him off the roster. The shift in focus towards players like Reaves and Rui indicates a significant reevaluation of team priorities. It'll be interesting to see how these trade talks unfold, and fans are undoubtedly eager to see how the team dynamics evolve in the coming weeks.

Quote from: kro55 on Today at 05:52:53 AM

I've read this news and the deadline is on Friday. If no team signs him up until Friday then he won't be qualified for the league's benefit that will definitely gonna help him and his family.

Any team that sees his situation could give him a hand and even he'll heat up the seat on the bench, that's no problem as long as he'll get that benefits that will help him and his family for the rest of their lives.

Mark Cuban might help but is there any spot on the roster?

It's a compassionate perspective, considering the potential positive impact on his family. Offering a player a chance, even if it means a role on the bench initially, could indeed be a meaningful gesture. The upcoming deadline adds a layer of anticipation, and it would be heartening to see a team step forward to provide such an opportunity. Sometimes, giving someone a chance can lead to unexpected contributions and, in this case, offer valuable support to his family. Here's hoping that a team recognizes the potential for both personal and professional growth and extends that opportunity before the deadline.

Quote from: LogitechMouse on Today at 07:15:14 AM

Remember how people look at James Harden trade when the Clippers lost 5 straight games since he joined the team? They looked at the Clippers like they're just an average team that has all-star players that isn't fit to play with one team. Now look where they at currently.

I believe it's the same with the Bucks. Chemistry will be affected, and so does the playstyle because each coach has a unique way of coaching their team. As for Doc Rivers, 2 games isn't enough for him to be judged. Though the defense really of the Bucks suck this season, it's the fault of their old coach, but I believe that the team will be better. Just give them some games I think. Like 10 games, and from there, let's decide as fans whether the acquisition of a new coach helped them or not.

Initial reactions to team changes can be quite deceiving. It takes time for players and coaches to establish the right chemistry and adapt to a new play style. The Clippers' experience with James Harden is a great example of how perceptions can shift over time.

Similarly, with the Bucks, adjusting to a new coach can indeed impact both the team's defense and overall performance. Two games might not be sufficient to assess Doc Rivers' impact accurately. Patience is key, and giving them around 10 games to find their rhythm seems like a fair approach. As fans, it's important to allow the team the space and time needed to adapt to changes, and then make a more informed judgment on how the acquisition of a new coach has influenced their performance. Let's hope for positive progress in the upcoming games.