Quote from: hZti on Today at 05:23:56 PM

Quote from: stompix on Today at 04:13:11 PM

Yeah, it's called periaqueductal gray synapse meltdown, or in layman terms, die hard bitcoiners letting go of their ego.
Won't happen!

Well if this is really the only reason then I think the problem is the mining community.

Because I think those are the only ones that will cry if block size will go up and fees will go down. Nobody else does really talk about this subject I think. Because I think you and me could also be called die hard bitcoiners with a forum membership of more then 10 years. The problem is really only that it is not really worth fighting for it. (Except you are a greedy miner Tongue

)

I don't think this is solution.

The problem is that people are storing jpegs in transactions. Before that, we could get 1 sat vB transactions confirmed with no problem in less than a day.

If blockcsize gets bigger, people will add videos to transactions.

I think if adoption of bitcoin really grows, 2nd layer will be the solution. LN is good but not enough.

I discovered Liquid recently, and it looks interesting. This was predicted by Hal Finney

Quote from: Hal on December 30, 2010, 01:38:40 AM

Actually there is a very good reason for Bitcoin-backed banks to exist, issuing their own digital cash currency, redeemable for bitcoins. Bitcoin itself cannot scale to have every single financial transaction in the world be broadcast to everyone and included in the block chain. There needs to be a secondary level of payment systems which is lighter weight and more efficient. Likewise, the time needed for Bitcoin transactions to finalize will be impractical for medium to large value purchases.

Neither satoshi or Finney said that block size should increase.

Include all transactions in the blockchain is not necessary