Quote from: nutildah on Today at 01:51:00 AM

Here's me imitating ChatGPT while answering your question:

Certainly! While its true that theymos has yet to make a definitive statement regarding the use of ChatGPT on the Bitcointalk forum, several moderators have expressed independent opinions on the issue. Such opinions include regarding ChatGPT-authored posts as spam, as non-conducive to the forum's overall environment, and even being contrary to the ethos of an online forum.

It is important to remember that viewpoints of the staff may change without warning, and you should always check their recent posts for policy updates. It is essential to conduct one's own research on such an issue before taking actions based on the information provided in this response.

Quote from: Rikafip on February 03, 2024, 09:01:43 PM

Quote from: tread93 on February 03, 2024, 08:26:00 PM

I just made a post quoting Chat GPT and I don't even know if that was following the rules.

As long as you mention the source (as you did) and properly format it you shoulnd't have any issues.

Yes. Quoting ChatGPT is fine. Its only a problem when people try to pretend they are the ones who wrote the material & want to take credit for it.

For example, I would much rather see this:

Quote from: tread93 on February 03, 2024, 08:21:54 PM

...
CHAT GPT SAYS THE FOLLOWING after my below prompting to it after I searched the proccess of signing one's bitcoin address since I have never actually done so nor knew the potential risks assumed once done:

"Would signing that message in any way compomise the security of the private key? What are the drawbacks to doing this for ones security both of their keys and of their location?
ChatGPT
Signing a message with a Bitcoin address does not directly compromise the security of the private key, as the key itself is never exposed or transmitted during the signing or verification process. ...

Than this:

Quote from: kuriboh on January 21, 2024, 06:51:57 PM

I think Bitcoin is a dynamic and evolving digital asset, subject to price fluctuations, regulatory developments, and technological advancements, as of my most recent knowledge update in January 2024.

Just something duplicitous about taking credit for stuff written by somebody/something else. It shouldn't be tolerated or we will soon be overrun by it.

Thank you M8 for spelling this out the way you did! I also liked the use of Chat GPT to not only show how robotic that response looks but also it displays more context in the analysis of what others on the forum are saying about this topic from the very beginning.

I would definitely have to agree that anyone trying to take credit for a compilation of what other people wrote put together by computers is just downright preposterous!