and no dont start singing the extremist bandwagon strawmen buzzwords of "bigblocker" scripted chants.. (where you have been around long enough to have learned about bitcoin enough, so should know better by now..) where you pretend to play dumb to not know about bitcoin but strangely know all the scripted chants extremes that try to avoid talking about scaling solutions that will help transaction utility, access, ease of the mempool.. (that are not about "bigblocker" extremes.) just to avoid talking about scaling solutions and instead just want to turn this topic into an advert for other systems far more buggy/insecure.. yep other systems(to want people to leave the bitcoin network) which avoid having transactions seen in mempools or filtered into blocks
Those are some pretty BIG accusations. I must say. You are probably giving me too much credit in regards to my supposed cooperative conspiracies.. . but yeah, it may well be that I have absorbed most if not all of the suspect talking points through osmosis.
That's typically the usual frankandbeans response when you're starting to get your viewpoint/argument across, and when he's recognizing that the readers are learning the truth of the matter. He'll start making ad hominem attacks to confuse the readers, and try to make you look that you're the person misinforming everyone.

Everyone simply needs to read the trust-ratings written by Bitcoin Core Developers Andrew Chow and Gregory Maxwell. I'm confused why people listen to him.