Quote from: delfastTions on February 06, 2024, 07:09:12 AM

Quote from: LUCKMCFLY on February 01, 2024, 07:32:38 PM

Quote from: delfastTions on January 31, 2024, 07:37:28 AM

Quote from: LUCKMCFLY on January 25, 2024, 04:24:16 PM

Quote from: delfastTions on January 24, 2024, 08:36:34 AM

~snip ~
......

By the way, in some cases, when you are asked to provide Personal Data and undergo identity verification under the KYC procedure, you can ask support a question about how legal this is in the jurisdiction in which the corresponding casino is registered. And it is worth mentioning that the provision of such data is an action subject to legislation on the confidential nature of Personal Data. And the casino is not a state-authorized body for collecting such information. And by the way, it turns out that there are no such laws in the local jurisdiction. And the collection of personal data is an initiative of the private business of this casino. And you can also write to support that KYC violates the law on Personal Data, legislation on consumer protection and your right to privacy as a fundamental human right. If after this you are required to perform KYC, then you must demand from support a response that is reasoned by legal norms. But they won't be able to write it. This is probably how you should defend your rights in the matter of player anonymity. True, all this correspondence takes a lot of time.

Well the truth is that everything is very interesting, when I Sstart to think about all the Implications that they have to do and see with the KYC, they should not put much effort into this , since they are regulations, but for example a person that handles funds under $2k should not require KYC, and these are Documents that we could handle with great intensity if we intensify our security measures, what you say is very interesting because as long as we are in a casino we don't know Anything new comes to mind all these possible things that we can do so that we can have the privilege of doing things Better and more when we know that things are quite Emphatic in the sense that things can be affected for our anonymity and privacy , our privacy It is always good to Maintain it , I Know that some say that privacy is no longer Necessary , that Sooner or later the deaths will be made Known no matter what, but I believe that things Should always be enjoyed as they are.

In this order of ideas, things can be Affected if we go to the Level that if we are not Interested , then in some way our data will be filtered, and although Things can Sometimes be Seen without any danger, it is not very advisable that things be seen Thus, for me it is necessary that things be done to protect our security, our data security is Necessary , not only in our funds but in everything that can be good to have a better understanding of what we are Getting into.

The KYC will always be Necessary so that we can Choose whether to do it or not , and as I said before it is better to comply with it in casinos that are one you know are Reliable , highly Reliable , have a very good reputation and that are always at the forefront of doing things. sbetter, always seeking continuous Improvement.

Here the question naturally arises about what personal data the user of the service must provide as part of the KYC procedure in order, for example, to play calmly and safely in a casino.
It’s one thing when for KYC it’s enough to provide only your email address and nothing else.
Then there is another confirmation by mobile phone (this is more accurate data for identifying the player due to the SIM card).
The next step could be to confirm the gadget by its identification number.
But this kind of KYC, where the casino requires photographs of the face and documents, this is already called confidential personal data.
And the requirements for their collection, storage and use are established by law. For example, in the European Union, this is a regulation called GDPR (General Data Protection Regulation).
In many cases, when it comes to providing your own confidential personal data to some service, you should refer to the redundancy of the requested data and maybe even dissuade their support from insisting on sending photographs and scans of documents. This is completely legal.
Moreover, in case of suspicion of fraud, law enforcement agencies are able to find out who you are simply by having only an email. And the rest of the data is collected for marketing and advertising. And this can be disputed.

It's like this, things can really be very determining when we are in the process of registering an account, for example, and when I go to register with any broker they always ask me for KYC, and it is how you say it, with phone number, with some documents, ID or even passport, that is something obligatory that I always do, I don't do it in any broker, because there is a whole list of brokers that make people do fraudulent things or worse still, there are brokers that when we are doing trading, they know Exactly where the resistances are, the supports, when we are doing some trading and we use a system, sometimes this makes me hit the stop loss and follow the natural movement of the action, that has happened to me with some brokers and again it is quite detestable, even with my personal data there, that is the other danger, it also happens like this in the exchanges, in that way we have a lot of data, sometimes they even do small KYC of our face when it is a somewhat substantial withdrawal, and once like that, one The best ones like Biancence always have the premise of kneeling in front of the authority of any country to provide information about their clients, something that seems disrespectful to me.

So this exchange does do things that way and yet many are still there to think that their data is provided in its entirety with everything they have to do and do, in this order we should see things from the closest point of view. That this would always be a big risk for everything, in the casinos, what are we to believe, if the brokers do it and the exchanges do it, what then is left for the casinos? The casinos that always depend on where they are to make their license moves, that is something we must see to make you think about what everything related to our data implies.

To my deep regret, almost all cryptocurrency users have now begun to get used to the fact that if cryptocurrency payments are used in some service that provides the service the user needs, for example, a crypto casino, it requires passing an identity check using the KYC procedure. This, in my opinion, is a completely wrong course of events in the crypto industry. Simply because cryptocurrency was invented to ensure anonymity and guarantee the authenticity and reliability of payment information. This is precisely the most important quality of the blockchain and Satoshi’s brilliant invention in general. But gradually, the authorities of different countries instructed cryptocurrency lovers to need KYC, although payments in cryptocurrency do not require such identification at all. This disgusting invention that you must provide your personal data significantly spoils the entire huge sector of anonymous payments in the financial world.
And “money laundering” is “bullshit” that the security forces of different countries came up with in order to make their lives easier and catch only those who have money instead of catching those who actually have tons of cocaine or tons of weapons. Law enforcement agencies simply easily catch such criminals, and this probably makes it easy for them to report on their effective work.
In short, the anonymity of payments should be preserved, and cryptocurrency lovers should, as much as possible, ignore the use of services with mandatory KYC.
And prefer services that do not require KYC. In the long run, this would benefit all of humanity, I think.

Exactly I think the same, things are like that, since I can remember with respect to crypto, I have always seen people's comments and wow they are just like us Legends who have a lot of time in the forum, in experiences, and well I have seen Commenters who say this, that the KYC was done to prevent money Launderers, and wow, I say to myself now, isn't it known that the Largest money laundering is not done with crypto, but with other things? This is something that cannot be done, personally I am a person who has Always been in the middle of these things, and I live Next to a country where drug trafficking is rampant and the people are in businesses that, ugh, are shady and One sees that and knows that the biggest money launderers prefer to do it with fiat money, and it is nothing but that it reaches the north and Europe, things work like that, there is no other way, so when we look for a way to do it like that different things because basically things turn out well and they turn out like this, so I am from a world where I see and have seen things that almost no one has seen, well I say no, it is not with cryptio that they do money laundering.

But how does one let them know that these things are not like that? Where I live, people who are like that are told to insult them, you read them: "They lack street" and that is something that we must see clearly, so when we are looking for ways to make ourselves more anonymous, people usually look for the biggest excuses for things not to happen, privacy will always be something that neither governments nor banking entities like, that's the point that they don't like it because obviously there is no control so as I have always said , we do not honor Satoshi, who invented bitcoin to decentralize us and move away from the traditional economy that always makes slaves, with bitcoin we are free, but still many like to feel controlled, when with caisnso we must be even more Free .