Quote from: Fara Chan on February 10, 2024, 11:16:10 PM

Quote from: wendty on February 06, 2024, 05:29:34 PM

that's right. I think the impact is even bigger than that. but the most important thing I think is the economy, especially in terms of food. in war food remains the main source of human energy. if there is a war of course its circulation will be very difficult. I think this is the main problem that is more serious than anything else from the war.

That is just part of several main things that can arise when war conditions begin to occur in a place. Because in general war can make the economy worse so that things such as foodstuffs and ready-to-use food are also affected by no longer being able to be supplied as they should. So these things were the first to experience bad influences apart from other things such as education and the development of the country's infrastructure which had not been completely repaired before the war occurred.

Apart from that, war itself can also destroy all agricultural land which can still be used as a basic source of food for local residents so that the food sector itself can suddenly experience paralysis if the war is still going on and never ends. Because farmers in war areas will definitely not be able to carry out their own activities as usual because they have to continue to protect themselves from war attacks, so this can really paralyze all economic sectors in a certain area.

Wars devastate, yes. There's more to food scarcity than missing meals. A damaged supply chain affects the economy and everyone's wallet. Farmers, traders, and consumers can't? They're left behind, prices soar, and purchasing power plummets. Wars freeze and reverse time. Education, healthcare, and innovation lose money for every bullet fired and field burned. And recovery? Economic revival is painful, not just rebuilding. This is about future prosperity, not simply survival. War is a luxury no nation can afford, as the economy shows