Quote from: franky1 on Today at 12:30:00 PM

Quote from: HmmMAA on Today at 10:55:51 AM

Quote from: franky1 on Today at 10:00:11 AM

HmmMAA sounds like his evidence that formed his opinion is sourced from coingeek

Actually , i dislike coingeek , there are some articles that worth reading from specific authors but many things written regarding csw are way over biased . I dislike Kurt Wuckert Jr too , he's the main reason is stopped getting information from coingeek some years back .

if you are reading ANYTHING from coingeek you already failed yourself. if you know enough about coingeek to know publishers names you know too much about them. by you admitting you previously relied on them and still read them. shows you are piling up on ketchup instead of gathering real sources(sauces)

as for your previous posts thinking CSW was smart and a candidate of satoshi due to intelligence. as hilariousetc just linked.. CSW not only used ghost writers to write his degree stuff, the stuff wrote were plagiarised. whole blocks of texts copy and pasted.. thus not showing any sign of individual intelligence/novel thinking.

he is cunning. has skills in forgery, but this does not translate to intelligence..
much like criminals have "street smarts" but get caught and put in prison.. does not translate to being smart enough to not get caught. they just have cunning to scam/steal enough to survive until caught. cunning is not equal to intelligence.
CSW is getting caught in court right now

I'll never understand why courts are considered "objective", since they're being ruled by (subjective) human beings with hidden agendas.

The exact same courts didn't declare mandatory lockdowns illegal... just sayin'.

I don't believe a single word that comes from them.