Wright probably told his followers they used to work together and that Wright is actually the co-inventor of C++.
LMFAO. You're kidding, right? Please tell me that you do. Usually, I'd take this as a joke, but considering the fraudster involved, there is nothing too outrageous to be considered merely a joke.Definitely a joke, heh. Although maybe I shouldn't make jokes that might inspire him to commit his next scam. It's certainly the kind of thing he'd attempt if he thought he could get away with it.
@DooMAD
That's what HmmMAA does when he doesn't have any arguments left, he resorts to personal insults.
That's what HmmMAA does when he doesn't have any arguments left, he resorts to personal insults.
And he can keep 'em coming if he likes. I'm quite relieved to hear it. If someone that disreputable calls me a piece of shit, I just take it as confirmation that I'm on the correct side of of the moral divide here.
If we were getting along and finding common ground, then I'd be deeply concerned.
Anyone who claims to be satoshi, but can't explain what satoshi's code does is undeniably a fraud. And it's permanently on record now for all the world to see. Wright can't explain the code. No one can come up with a justifiable excuse as to how the real satoshi wouldn't be capable of answering that question. Ergo, he isn't satoshi. That's all the evidence any rational person should need.
I mean, we didn't need that to know Craig is a fraud, but yeah, the trial should have just been closed early after that. I just wish they could pull out a laptop, link it up the the screen in the court and tell Craig to code bitcoin from scratch. That would be interesting.
We definitely didn't need it. But it should now be far more difficult for Wright to maintain his little fanclub of 'SV'ers. At some point the remaining fools will grow tired of people laughing at them and calling their intelligence and/or integrity into question. To continue supporting SV now would mean someone would have to be either braindead or malicious.