Quote from: apogio on February 26, 2024, 06:27:33 PM

Quote from: DooMAD on February 26, 2024, 01:17:41 PM

Not sure about everyone else, but I'd rather this topic didn't degenerate into another inane "who is satoshi?" thread. We've got hundreds of those already. I'd politely ask if everyone kept the focus to the historical interest aspect (and definitely don't engage with deranged shitgibbon LeezHamilton, because that's a sure-fire way to ruin a topic rapidly). Faketoshi does not belong in this thread. Talk about him elsewhere, please.

You are right. We shouldn't have derailed the thread like that.

The main purpose of the topic, for me, apart from providing information about satoshi's ideas, is to help us realise whether Bitcoin has severely diverted from the original version.

To this extent, I am looking forward to hearing everyone's opinion.

On the contrary, although i don't know if am right, but I think the emails since 2009 till 2011 pointing to the existence of Satoshi is brought about by the case between COPA vs Dr. Wright.
One is to expect several of such real or unreal evidences to surface so that the man claiming to be the real Satoshi and has the blue print or white paper to the whole Bitcoin idea would be shamed and made to pay good fine for claiming to be something he is not.