Quote from: Assface16678 on March 08, 2024, 06:43:22 AM

Quote from: CryptSafe on March 08, 2024, 02:00:59 AM

Quote from: AHOYBRAUSE on March 07, 2024, 04:21:16 AM

Quote from: CryptSafe on March 07, 2024, 01:18:07 AM

I understand that you can make your decision yourself but I think the casino just did that to aid minimise the lose and also allowed you to gamble but a limited amount for gambling.

Just accept the decision of the casino with fate and possibly give yourself sometime off from huge amount of gambling and mind you, be careful as I see some post with an invite. You never can tell till you have the experience and by then it might be too late.

It's easy to say "just accept this" but actually it's not.
Sure he could just move on but then he would leave behind a highly valuable diamond VIP account.
Just to show you, to reach dimond 1 you must have wagered 25 million $.
It comes with cumstomised benefits, of course increased weekly/monthly bonus and reload, and so on.

So basically you can get lossback, better bonus than anywhere else with this. So nobody would want to start a new journey somewhere else. But OP, if you do want to play somewhere else, you can consider bc.game. Let me refer you and we can share the benefits. Wink

Stake is a lot cause, once you are limited they will never lift it, speaking from experience.

Obviously, some casinos just promising what they too can not offer. OP I really understand your situation currently and I think you should look into Metawin.com to see for yourself all the available features on the casino. I believe you will have a good time with the casino mentioned . Why not give it a try or.

The thing is that the casino set a sudden rule or restriction for a gambler or a user on their website for many years. It's hard to accept that after all this time or years the gambler spent in betting or doing gambling on that website, they suddenly limited his maximum bet just because he won a huge amount of profit. I see that it is unfair, and of course it is suspicious that even customer service has not taken action about the complaint of the customer. Well, I don't want to judge the casino, but with that movement, it shows that the casino website is a red flag, which means they are not fair to their customers. But yeah, we can't do anything about that issue because they will just negate the complaint and keep their business running, so you can either get out of that website and find another trusted casino website or incur the limited betting amount.

If you had read thoroughly then you would understand the state of this case. I will not in any way blame the casino for limiting the player to low amount game. Maybe they are taking measures to protect further loss on the side of the players and come to talk of it, stake casino is a well known and reputable casino in the gambling industry so I think with their and stage at which they have attained, intentionally limiting players from big gaming should be the last thing they will be thinking about but from the way OP presented this case here, I felt they are trying to help OP minimise the risk of losing more and nothing more than that.