Quote from: Uhwuchukwu53 on Today at 07:20:49 AM

From my perspective of reasoning see it as result of many large companies adopting the use of AI to work in certain area of man power, allot of machine are already on ground that can handle some man power which will take a month with 20-30 persons in a day, in situation like this companies will lay off some of their man power.

Recession can't just happened with just few numbers of worker lay off , but if eventually all company and firms adopt the use of AI where it limit the number of worker as few will be required to operate the AI it can be seen as recession in workers perspective.

In fact, a recession occurs when we see overall economic activity decreasing and we can see this from the slowdown in economic growth in a certain place over a certain period of time. So, do you want to look at it locally or globally, Apart from that, there has been a decline in sluggish consumer demand due to weak people's incomes due to difficulty in finding money or other financial crises.

For the worker sector, AI technology cannot necessarily be justified in its use as the main cause if seen from cases of its use. The new perspective is correct if its massive adoption by large companies throughout the world has occurred everywhere. Well, that can only be said to be in the category. However, if only a small amount of use may not be the dominant cause. I think there is another, more reasonable reason that the dominant people now find it difficult to earn money and its value is low when spent.