Quote from: joniboini on March 12, 2024, 08:25:43 AM

Quote from: delfastTions on March 12, 2024, 06:30:33 AM

In general, it turns out that gambling players who want to remain anonymous for various reasons are left to choose casinos that are not very reliable and not too well-known, which indeed increases the likelihood for such players to encounter fraudulent casino sites. In this I see clear discrimination against anonymous players. And for some reason everyone thinks that non-anonymous players are somehow “more correct” than anonymous players.
But this is completely wrong and this discrimination against people based on the principle of anonymity/non-anonymity, in my opinion, should be stopped.
Moreover, this must be done at the legislative level.

What kind of law can achieve what you propose though? So you will allow anonymous/VPN users to register multiple times, but make sure there is adequate cheating protection that somehow must be able to detect that one account is connected to the other through chain analysis? Wouldn't that mean they don't fully respect the users' privacy too? I've never heard people suggest that anonymous players are "wrong" or something similar, but you need to realize that these businesses probably don't want to spend more on filtering accounts so they just ban tools like VPNs. If you still risk it and win it big, there is a high chance thy will just "scam" you. I doubt a government cares about users' privacy so hoping they make a different license for that is kinda cope.

Now, of course, governments of all countries are aimed at eliminating anonymity. And the adoption of laws on anonymous payments looks like nothing more than a fantasy and simply like a myth, a fairy tale. And governments justify this by fighting money laundering and fighting fraud. This, of course, partly helps to identify criminal financial schemes.

But I think that the gain from such total de-anonymization is not too great. But the loss of anonymity is theoretically a huge violation of the human right to privacy, which, of course, cannot be completely ignored by the legislators of a civilized country. Therefore, I still have hope that the issue of the absolute legality of anonymous payments in cryptocurrencies will still be resolved somehow. Perhaps this will not happen in the coming years, but after many years. But humanity, having had enough of accurate digital personal identification in necessary cases and in generally completely unnecessary cases, that is, almost always, will still return to the issue of the need for anonymity and maintaining the secret of private life.
And now, apparently, it is too early to update this issue at the legislative level, even in civilized countries.