Quote from: hilariousetc on Today at 12:34:22 PM

Day 21

More going over the summary arguments yesterday. One of my personal highlights was COPA's Hough commenting something along the lines of not to commit degree snobbery, but Craig's qualifications were of mediocre grade, from unprestigious universities, and his PHD thesis has been found to have included plagiarised content. Burn Grin

. Bringing up Craig's blank expression during the unsigned integers debacle was also enjoyable: https://twitter.com/digitalnaut/status/1767830627615715382

Craig's council also took the stand to make their closing arguments, but the best they had was why hasn't the real Satoshi made an appearance to shoot Craig's accusations down. I mean, what sort of bullshit is that. They really don't have much here apart from Craig is smart and has patents and there's currently no better candidate blah blah blah. If Craig doesn't end up with perjury charges this trial will have been a waste. Craig's council has been pleading today that even if Craig loses it will be against his human rights to be prohibited from claiming to be Satoshi. Personally, I hope he his barred from doing so and maybe his "human rights" case should be left up to a higher court.

Quote from: headingnorth on Today at 07:21:53 AM

Netflix should seriously consider making a documentary about CW and his trial. I mean the comedy just writes itself and there is so much of it! Docu-comedy? Cheesy

I don't think a show based purely on this trial would be very entertaining, but I do think a film or maybe documentary about the whole Faketoshi saga would be. Maybe we need some sort of conclusion here though to make for a good ending. Andrew O’Hagan's The Satoshi Affair where Craig fled Australia was particularly thrilling reading for me and would certainly make a great part in a film or documentary: https://www.lrb.co.uk/the-paper/v38/n13/andrew-o-hagan/the-satoshi-affair

why hasn't the real Satoshi made an appearance to shoot Craig's accusations down. I mean, what sort of bullshit is that.

You must be joking ! I have restrained myself with great effort. I thought of attending the court but I chose not to attend the court. If I did attend the court then the whole fun would have come to an end abruptly and Craig Wright could have blamed me because he has lost the case. But somehow I did my best not to interfere directly but I might bring Craig Wright to High Court back again for something else. Once the water goes in his nose and if he wakes up and repents then I will forgive his sin and reward him with a great surprise of credentials of a great actor.

You all are in the talk forum and in the Bitcoin space laughing and cheering each other that Craig has failed to produce an extraordinary proof for his extraordinary claim. Please piety on Craig. He is just a human and after all he is autistic. So please do not use rude language to insult Craig Wright. If you do he might get very upset and try to commit suicide again. I do not like to lose Craig Wright. He will correct himself and will not interfere again against the Bitcoin developers.