It's just that JackpotRacer is not part of our community. He is simply a disappointed narcissist who is harassing us for his own agenda, which is to tailor our product to his desires.
I thought again about your very insulting and unjustified attack and I am sorry to tell you that you are Eva and the owner of Blackjack.fun and maybe you are both one person anyway.
You have the HUBRIS syndrome, but a very strong one.
sadly I have to run now so I will answer the other members postings later
Fair enough and thank you for asking for a short recap and not attacking me without any knowledge of the events.
it will be a pleasure for me but I cannot promise that it will be short
I apologize in advance in case you don't like colored text, as I like it, and for some reason the forum gives us the option to format the text as we wish.
I am also glad that you somehow remember that Blackjack.fun and I were in a very friendly environment as I wanted to help find bugs without asking for any bounty and Blackjack.fun was happy about it and even used my bug reports to fix them.
To better understand where the problem was and is, it always helps to walk in my shoes and also in Blackjack.fun's shoes.
I started playing free roll tournaments there because I love Blackjack and I am also a gaming tester and former casino owner.
You could say that I am a Blackjack expert and can give very good advice when asked.
I quickly understood the main problem with the way the tournaments were offered, but this was not the time to tell Blackjack.fun to close their tournaments and redevelop them, so I concentrated on finding some bugs and giving my feedback, which was appreciated by the owner and he even fixed some.
So the day came when a player in a tournament used an exploit that I, as an experienced blackjack player, immediately spotted.
Frankly, I was shocked that the software that I understood had been in beta testing for several years had this exploit.
Now please put on my shoes and think about what you would do. I will tell you what I did and remember, in these tournaments, the winner wins 1USDT.
I did not immediately report this exploit to the owner of Blackjack.fun because I wanted to make sure that it was not a one-time glitch and anyway it was not a 100USDT or more tournament as it was only a 1USDT tournament.
From that point on, I signed up for the tournaments where the player who used the exploit signed up and tried to sit at the same table. I still think it was right and smart to do it that way. He used the exploit over and over again, and he actually taught me, without knowing it, when to use the exploit.
After I was sure when and how to use the exploit, I waited with patience for the exploit to come up against the player who taught me the exploit and I could use it.
Then it happened and now I hope you still have my shoes on
I used the exploit and I need to explain in more detail and with an example that is not related to Blackjack as I don't want to explain the exploit in detail here, but explains exactly what I did and not as members here are saying that I used the exploit to win the 1USDT tournament
(sorry for my laugh)My intention was to show the player and the exploiter that I now know the exploit and it would be better if he stopped using it. to be honest I am not a person who yells police police.....
I wanted to report the exploit later, but I would never reveal the player's username. why should he be punished? because he was smart enough to find this exploit or even needs the 1USDT. we don't know where he is from.
When the exploit came out, I could use it once in a game and no one would get suspicious, or I could use it many times in the same game and everyone would see what I was doing, and especially the person who used the exploit would be shocked that the exploit was now known. This is what I have done, as I have used it many times over and over again in the same game. I need to mention that to use the exploit makes only sense at the end of the tourney to have a very big chance to win the tourney.
Let me try to explain it to you with a simple and perhaps silly example.
7 people are sitting at a table in a coffee shop. 10 $100 bills are spread out on the table. I have very fast hands because I am a magician and I take 1 bill and no one pays attention.
In comparison, the blackjack player who used the exploit once to win the tournament would be stupid to do it again in the same game as it makes no sense even he could do it and he might get caught by other players.
back to the table in the coffee shop where I grabbed a $100 bill and no one saw it. but I did it again and again which means I grabbed 1 bill and another bill and another bill. so few or all 7 at the table saw what I did. what did they do? they called the police to file a complaint.
This is what happened when I used the exploit and intentionally exaggerated few players or only one complaint to the owner of Blackjack.fun. The Blackjack.fun owner did not know my username on the tables as he knew only Jackpotracer from his thread in the forum.
When I tried to log in to the site to check the tournaments and see if the player, who now knows that I know the exploit, is using it again, I was shown the KYC page for Blackjack.fun.
I DMed the owner and asked why I get the KYC site and asked kindly to remove it. he then asked me what is my username
and when telling him my username his answer was
"Ahaa, you got it because you abused the bug in blackjack tournaments of course. As you saw other players complained about you."
I did not see that any user complaint about me! how could I and if yes I would be happy that they saw it.
the he asked me and please understand that he is the developer
"What was the bug and how did you reset the timer?"
he is asking me
I did not tell him as he played stupid and did not want to let me back to the site without KYC. why KYC if I did not ask for any withdrawal I had about 30 USDT there. I helped him and did not do it for the money. so insisting on doing KYC for nothing but helping him, sorry this was very strange and unfair behavior.then it started to get worse and another DM I got was
"We need around 50+ ppl on tournaments to actually test the software. Big amount of ppl will never take part of the tourney where reward is 1usdt. Very logical. Other players got very mad because you didnt let them play in the table and reset the timer on 1 usdt tables. This is how you collected (at least partly) the funds right? Devs havent checked the exact logs yet. Better to focus on development.
Amounts are very small and it is not about the money of course. If it is about the 24 usdt for you then we can take kyc down till you make a withdrawal."
Now he is actually saying that players are complaining that I did not let them play because I used the exploit. Yes, I used the exploit in such an exaggerated way that they must have seen it. he should be happy that I found it and exposed it! the original user did not expose it because no one complained for years.
then he admits that the devs and I know that he is the developer had not the time to check the game logs. I asked so many times to check the game logs so he can see how many times I used the exploit to win 24USDT LOL but why didnt he check the logs? if he would check the logs he would see that I did it once but many times after the other in same game and he would see that the other player used it more than once in every tournament he played. why is or was he not interested in checking the logs and proving it?
yes that is the big question!!!!! I have my theories.
at one stage I got another DM saying:
"If you create a document of the bugs and suggestions we can reward you with 100 USDT as a one time deal. That would actually make things faster. Most of the bugs we already know. Just need to know when exactly the bugs apper. We could save some funds instead of creating bigger tournaments. But it can work only if you have a good attitude with us. Otherwise it is impossible to communicate."
Now he wanted to buy me even I told him I am not in for the money. As no one can buy I denied the 100USDT proposal and insisted to give the 30USDT he owes me to give it to a Legendary member so he can donate it in a game and rounds riddle or whatever he wants. if he would do this all would be over and no Scam accusation.
That is it as I have to stop myself as I could go on and on as I have many more DMs to show how they behaved unprofessionally to someone who only wanted to help and was not in it for the money.
anyway sorry that it was a very long answer at the end
if you have any questions if I confused you please ask and it be a pleasure to answer.
All other members, please keep your attacks and insults to yourself and read and try to understand both sides by walking in the shoes of both of us.
Thanks and Cheers
edit:
few minutes later as I forgot to mention that all this because of as they say they owe me 24USDT and I say which I even did not ask to withdraw
Thank you for the long response and to try to portrait an idea about what happened so far.
tl;dr;
It's the bug the other guy abused and you discovered it later. You informed them but it was them (Eva and blackjack team) who then blamed you to use the bug to take advantage. Money is not the concern for you, all you want is the bug to be fixed so that players have fair ground on the tables.
I think, none of it matters now what matter is, have blackjack fixed the bug or it is still exists?
Thank you again.