Got it, but it is irrelevant since all my bets were legit and clean.
I'm still waiting for BC Support... what a disgrace.
Actually... the bets were not legit and clean, according to
this post, and that the one made the ruling --at least the way I understand it-- was their sportsbook provider. Namely, the one conducting the investigation was the sportsbook provider and they are complying to the findings made by the sportsbook provider.
Is it unreasonable to seek a clearer explanation along with supporting evidence? Even after requesting the betting history, they chose to ignore it. What if their refusal to provide this information indicates their lack of credibility, potentially confirming my suspicions of a scam?