Quote from: DooMAD on Today at 11:56:07 AM

Quote from: ABCbits on Today at 08:36:15 AM

Quote from: DooMAD on March 25, 2024, 12:02:21 PM

Quote from: ABCbits on March 25, 2024, 09:21:15 AM

block size should be increased based on specific measurement

Not your call. Block size will only be altered if/when those securing the chain collectively agree to bear that cost. No formula or measurement will make that decision for them. The impetus will come from them and not the other way around.

I never state i make any call either. And i never say about implementing formula which determine maximum block size either.

It sounded as though you were suggesting that someone would calculate some costs, determine a block size based on those costs and that those securing the chain would just kinda go along with it. But whatever you did or didn't say, I'm making it abundantly clear that it doesn't work like that.

sounds like it was DOOMAD that suggested we should wait for someone (core)

funny how he says users dont get to tell core what to code and users just follow core, (backward compatible (opt in after the activation by core) buzzwords) or users can make another network if they dont like cores decisions...
now he says users get to choose collectively(consensus)

seems he forgets his own narrative of which side he sits on..