Quote from: Aanuoluwatofunmi on Today at 12:46:25 PM

It still bothers me when i see a set of five or six people overseeing the affairs of a signatory campaign and couldn't detect for the use of AI from their participants, am sure it may not have to be this same guy alone, there may be more other participants found on the same shade for using AI, now, it is clear that this guy in question had been caught severally and reported, but the campaign managers are doing nothing to take action against such, which could in other way implies that they accept the use of AI for their postings in the campaign, if it were to be other managers, they would have taken quick action on that.

AI as far as I know is not deemed illegal. Is it good to allow the use of AI in users posts? No, not at all. If we allow AI there will be no more genuine conversation on the forum and 5000 users spamming a day to earn money.

I cannot speak for the managers of any campaigns, some of them may not be aware of any AI detecting tools. Detecting AI is not 100% perfect either.

Quote from: The Sceptical Chymist on Today at 12:51:13 PM

Quote from: yahoo62278 on Today at 11:40:31 AM

As far as the AI goes, the mods agree apparently since there are so many reports marked good. Being as AI is still fairly new, there might be some errors in detecting AI content, but if it walks like a duck........

This (in addition to the imminent threat) is why I'm inclined to shoot first and ask questions later. I'll sleep just fine, and the rest of you can do what you like, but AI-generated shitposts might potentially be an overwhelming problem very soon. And honestly, this is the first member I've tagged for this. It isn't like I'm on a rampage circa December 2017.

You or someone should make a list listing all suspected AI posters and get them all blacklisted from campaigns. Let other users see that there will be consequences for their actions.