Quote from: hahay on Today at 04:57:56 PM

Quote from: Altryist on Today at 03:17:14 PM

Quote from: Justbillywitt on Today at 02:03:08 PM

It baffles me when people keep blaming the poor performance of Manchester United to the injured players. When those players where fit last season what did they achieve? I also hear people say Manchester United don't have quality players at their dressing room, it makes me laugh too. United have been recruiting players of their choice, they have been spending big you know. Ten Hag brought in players he believed could help him win games, but unfortunately these players don't leave to expectations. Even the ones that were doing good before Ten Hag came in has reduced drastically. All of the players are not playing well, so the players can't be the problem, rather it is the management. United have enough and right players, but the tactics are poor that's why they are not winning matches.

Ten Hag was given free reign, and he decide to focus on young players, but apparently he did not take into account the fact that they would have little experience to compete with the leaders. Does it make sense to blame anyone now, I think not. Will ten Hag be able to radically change the game of the team with such a squard, I think that the answer will also be no, at least in the near future he will definitely not be able to achieve this.

If the team has spent a lot of money to buy a lot of players with high costs, then it should be possible for Manchester United to be consistent with good results also this season. Although indeed, a process will still be needed and for me Manchester United still looks fine and not as bad as others say. Because anyway, for me as long as the team can still compete in the top zone or at least in the top six then yes, these results for me are still a good result . Because after all, it is certainly noteasy to be able to compete strongly in the top four or in the top five, so when the team is still in the process of forming a young team then this for me is still understandable because after all, during this process Manchester United also did not sink into the relegation zone.

It sounds non sense to read it. Don't you consider some players like mason mount as an expensive players? what's united got from him? literally nothing, right? it means that it doesn't really matter how expensive or cheap the price of player but the result will be determining by the player itself.
Look at mainoo, far cheaper than mount but he has helped united a lot even he has been included in england national club. It's enough to realize that if the price of player will not give you guarantee for the player to perform very well in the club.