Quote from: TelolettOm on March 29, 2024, 11:45:34 PM

Quote from: freedomgo on March 24, 2024, 11:47:06 AM

Crypto has been known for anonymity. During the early stage, we like to promote it using the words "decentralized" and "anonymous ", and it's the main reason why a lot of gamblers have chosen to gamble using crypto to gain full privacy, but it seems like things have really change a lot now as gamblers are looking for a casino that are licensed while some casinos who promotes anonymous gambling eventually act like a fiat casino that requires KYC.

What do you think about this one, where is are we heading? And can we still consider crypto casino different from fiat casino?

This will happen and may still be expected on gambling platforms which incidentally do not require anything like KYC with official ID documents from the government. If it only requires email or other data but doesn't require attaching ID data from the government, then that will be quite meaningful for gamblers who prefer things that are more private. Because after all, privacy is very important, for anyone. Especially when entering the world of gambling, there are most people who definitely prefer privacy, more than others.

For, when we provide our personal data along with photo ID or official data from other governments, it really damages our privacy in online activities. Moreover, we cannot guarantee how safe the data is, there is no 100% guarantee regarding whether it is safe or not. In fact, there is no guarantee that the data is truly safe. This is the importance of privacy.

But unfortunately, not all top gambling platforms have such a high reputation. There are some of them who require a KYC system to know that their users are not in their restricted area. So this can reduce the risk of them being subject to sanctions at some point. This is quite a dilemma. So, whatever it is, again it will depend on each of us, what we will do or choose.

Gamblers cherish internet anonymity. And that makes sense. We're tracked online, so where are your actions not a commodity? That matters. Especially in high-stakes games

KYC seems fair. Stops money laundering and maintains transparency, but at a high cost. It removes anonymity. Every aspect of your life is a data point to be purchased, sold, and evaluated. Once you gamble, you're investigated

That's the issue. Big, trusted sites almost require KYC. Partially for safety, partially to please governments. But it’s a move for greater control. In addition to playing, you're a well-organized profile. Do you comply? Lose a degree of freedom? Or go for riskier, unregulated spaces? No simple answer exists, and it's not about morality but what you're willing to sacrifice. Because it's not niche. It symbolizes the digital world's privacy crisis