Quote from: Vod on Today at 01:20:27 AM

Quote from: JollyGood on Today at 12:20:38 AM

I would like to start this thread to discuss what possible logic could be applied by campaign managers when they select certain members to participate in campaigns they manage.

The campaign managers only see the money, and the websites (who are not here) only see the traffic.

You raise a valid point but I know of cases where managers have refused to take up jobs because of either the reputation of the company involved or their previous interactions. When it comes to campaign managers, it is not always about money.

Having said that, there is one in particular that did not stop promoting the Sinbad mixer even though around 5 months prior I created a thread outlining it would be seized because it was operated by a criminal enterprise. I would conclude your words are completely appropriate for that individual and maybe some others but definitely not all.

Quote from: _act_ on Today at 06:39:22 AM

If I bring a campaign right now, I can not taken arimamib becuase he lacks in many areas, both merit ans reputation.

He definitely does lack in many area yet he is enrolled on the Stake campaign like a huge number of participants in that campaign are.

I guess the criteria required to wear a Stake signature is extremely low therefore if spammers and super- spammers (several that use AI) are accepted on the Stake campaign, the primary person to blame is their campaign manager Carollzinha