Quote from: JollyGood on Today at 11:41:39 PM

The bar seems to have fallen extremely low when it comes to getting enrolled in the Stake campaign but I completely understand your views on the subject about managers implementing their own rules and interpretations. Having said that, what would you do? If you were a campaign manager would you select these two members for campaigns?

Quote from: KingsDen on Today at 11:34:46 PM

I believe there was a time the Stake manager Carollzinha updated Stake campaign rules and included a rule that prohibits Stake participants from using AI. If such a rule is still being recognised by her, she should therefore remove anyone proven to use the forum with AI.

As of neutral tags or negative tags, it is at the manager's discretion to choose who will promote her project, especially if the tags are not related to scam. Sometimes inaccurate ratings are given, so the manager should decide the severity of each tag and act to the best interest of the project.

If I were to be a campaign manager, I would accept the above two users only if these conditions are met;

I have large numbers of participants to hire.
More credible users are not showing interest in my campaign.

However, I think for you to have a more organised response, you could just add a poll to this thread.