I'll invite you to read my posts again, carefully, and return here once you did.
Sorry, my bad. My last post was supposed to be an explanation for the other readers why value betting isn't something bad.
BC? Why BC? GekkeBelg opened scam accusations across many platforms. The most recent one, of which prompt BGC to finally do his investigation, was with coins.game. People are talking in general here, and you're focusing on... BC? Because he didn't get refund on that case, or for what reason is it does BC specifically being mentioned over and over?
Why did I mention BC.Game so much? It's just random luck. First I pointed out that GekkeBelg made a mistake against them. Then I found their 'betting academy' and wanted to point out the hypocrisy of sportbooks.
Because he didn't get refund on that case
They ended up paying GekkeBelg, even though they didn't have to(According to their TOS).
Overall I think we are on the same page.
Does that automatically translates that GekkeBelg is, WinTomato aside, innocent here? I say, "no".
I would say yes, but obviously I'm very biased.
In regards to BC's "hypocrisy", I can probably explain this part based on what casino representatives explained to me. Basically, it goes in line with what BGC said, regarding sportsbook providers and how they tagged people.
On some cases, casinos [though not all] are actually don't have issue with value bettor, that's probably why BC have that page on their academy [I didn't glance at that link and take your word for it], but from time to time, their sportsbook provider detected some abusive behavior and asked the casino to hold the winning.
We are not strictly speaking about value betting, there are numerous cases of bets being held for investigation for several reasons, like arbing, limitation circumvention, odds manipulation, you name it. On some of these cases, as it is well known, it's the provider who ask for that investigation, not the casino's own initiative.
Going back to the value betting and BC [or other casinos], most of the time, if the violation is not too severe [let's say they're just value betting and not multi-acc-ing] or on what they can tolerate, they'll just let the case go. Which I shall assume means they're paying those users from their own pocket, given the provider will not pay the winning.
This should explains [actually, more to strengthen what BGC said] why GekkeBelg got flagged numerous times across platform, because the providers have his data, he's been marked by the providers.
So, with above paragraphs as an addition, since you brushed it on your last sentence, I'll repeat my previous reflection, does GekkeBelg innocent? I'll stay with my previous answer: no.
I believe he's well versed on casino and how they works. I mean, IIRC he claimed he's been playing on hundred of sportbook? He certainly more or less realized how things work with sportsbook and their provider, and he still utilize this strategy, knowing those casinos are paying him from their own pocket.
So, is he wrong? No. But is he innocent? Also no.