Quote from: EluguHcman on April 09, 2024, 07:39:35 AM

What would make a government to rebrand their traditional currencies just to edit some graphic designs with excessive amounts of money bills involved to execute such project that doe not mean to brings more values to the currency neither does it boost the economy level of the nation?

Meanwhile such is been an undeveloped country which the implemented bill for such valueless project is big enough to create infrastructures with the potentials of building the masses with valuable skills and otherwise a national financial revenue.

Do we assume it is still one of the money laundering strategies that the government intentionally creates loopholes in other to steal the public funds? Because even after the implementations and execution of Such projects, the same governments clamours that the nation has run out of funds after giving accounts of those irrelevant executed projects.

Usually, government projects are only for a small part of the population and isn't going to do much good for the majority. When it comes to government projects the main goal is to make it seem as cheap as possible so there won't be much opposition to it. Once the project started the costs are going to balloon and in there much anybody else can do, because stopping the project would make it seem like a fail and lead to a public outcry. I remember reading about a study that found out that almost all the large-scale government projects in the western world ended up over budget. It's so much easier to make decisions with money that you don't own and I wish there was more oversight over how inefficient politicians are with tax payers’ money. The problem is that most people are not really interested in politics in detail and will accept all the excuses the politicians offer for their high spending.