Quote from: hedgeh0g on April 11, 2024, 09:02:15 PM

Quote from: Accardo on April 11, 2024, 08:50:43 PM

It's valid to say that gambling doesn't have a specific price range required for players to wager money. Players can wager with a few cents and enjoy the game. Greed is a factor that should discussed when looking into taking risks while gambling. Gamblers who despite their little income are high rollers will run short of money easily. Unlike the rich gamblers who have enough funds to fall back on, low rollers who out of greed turned to high rollers, have nothing to hold on to, except applying for loans. The high rollers in the rich class also tend to lose enough money, and some of them go into debt as well, but the process tends to get easier for them compared to low-income earners.

Hence, it's brilliant that both the rich and broke players adjust their risk thoughts while gambling. Because it's quite very degenerating to the gambler's wealth. And if care isn't taken the gambler will end up regretting the whole process of risking lots of money while gambling. In a nutshell, gamblers regardless of their wealth level, are both in trouble when risking more in gambling. Gambling addiction does not pity both parties, avoiding it is better than playing smart.

It is interesting that some gambling games, such as poker, where the player's professionalism plays a vital role, allow poor but strong players to climb up the social ladder. At the same time, rich players lose part of their rich fortune, and a redistribution of wealth occurs. I would call it a tool in capable hands. In any case, I think this doesn’t happen often, but I like the fact of such stories. In poker, in addition to professional play, you need to have a steely moral state, but this is difficult for the poor, because they have never seen such huge money and the desire to spend it is great, but this cannot be done if the poor player wants to continue to grow in limits and beat the rich.

But if we take it in general, as you correctly noted, risk is the most important thing for the poor and the rich, and if someone starts not to notice it, then their losses will hit them very hard, including in their wallet.

Expertise or professionalism in poker games may play a vital role, but the hands a player holds matter so much. A professional may not decide which card gets to him; hence it could affect his chances of winning in the game, despite his level of knowledge in poker games. However, the rich players can stay more in the game, thereby leading to a bigger chance of risking their wealth. As they'll hardly run out of funds. A low-income player who keeps winning can stay in the game, but may not be comfortable in increasing his risk, as he's not fine with losing what he's got.

In this context of having both the rich and poor in a poker game. I don't think their financial class helps in the way they play, what matters their level of acquittance in the game. A rich player who is not familiar with poker games may get lowballed in when playing with some low-income experienced poker players. However, it's all gambling, and the hands matter, but experience also plays a vital role. An inexperienced rich player may wager a high amount on a low hand that he's holding, that's a blunder, and it'll make the low-income player win more in this case. I think the level of knowledge about a game can influence the way a player decides to risk his way in such a game.