Quote from: BlackHatCoiner on April 13, 2024, 07:51:41 PM

Quote from: theymos on April 13, 2024, 06:58:29 PM

Jambler "has a feature advertised for taking property, improving its privacy somehow, and then returning roughly the same type of property"

Strictly speaking, it doesn't. Jambler doesn't act as a mixer, in and of itself. For partners, yes, it takes property, and yes it might return roughly the same plus a profit, but it nowhere says that it improves their privacy. The point of being a partner is to earn profit.

I could go on, but I don't think it matters, because it seems that you've made your choice. You could slightly change the criteria in the OP and it'd be rightly considered a mixer. You can't beat the admin.

you need to look at it in terms of US Law. Bitcointalk and theymos is subject to US Law.

Jambler aids and abets a mixer = fact

if bitcointalk aids and abets Jambler they could be charged with US federal law violations.

Best case I can explain it with is this article

https://www.hrw.org/report/2013/12/05/offer-you-cant-refuse/how-us-federal-prosecutors-force-drug-defendants-plead

it is about federal crimes mostly drugs ,but read the techniques the government used against people.

Theymos does not want any part of this.

I can't say that I blame him in the least.