Quote from: potentabit on Today at 01:31:37 AM

Quote from: potentabit on April 14, 2024, 12:35:06 AM

Quote from: Jota_US on April 14, 2024, 12:04:43 AM

Quote from: potentabit on April 13, 2024, 03:01:51 PM

Quote from: jstefanop on April 12, 2024, 06:17:27 PM

Quote from: potentabit on April 12, 2024, 05:56:09 PM

MCU1 full node with Apollo 2 Standard attached to USB.
Using v2.0.4-beta

Noticed that hash rate to NiceHash is only a fraction of actual mining.
When looking at the stats only shows one of the 2 miners (Apollo2) reporting data at no more than fraction (1.2 TH) of actual rate (5.8TH).
Apollo BTC is showing 1.9 TH and 0TH on NiceHash account.

Is this on nice hash only? Would wait at least an hour for hashrate to settle.

Might be NiceHash only. One of the 2 (Apollo 2 S) is sending data at severely reduced rate even after a few hours. MCU1 unit does not send data at all as shown in the "Hashboards and Pools" page.
NiceHash may require separate Id's for each mining unit?

I believe what you are seeing is the Apollo BTC is hashing and the Apollo 2 is not.
That's why you see "reduced' hashrate but actually it's the Apollo BTC's hashrate that you are seeing. They are mislabeled in the software.

I have the same problem with miningrigrentals, I can only get the Apollo BTC to hash there, the Apollo 2 doesn't send data. It works fine on Braiins though, but I would like to have it work on MRR.
I believe you would need separate id's for each unit but it doesn't look like you can do that right now.

OK, I see and agree, they must be cross labeled or not reading assigned values. Also agree that some pools need separate Id's depending on how data is sent/received. I have a few GPU rigs on NiceHash and all cards on each rig have their own ID's

Hopefully Monday's update will address some of these issues as we are still in a Beta version.

I got both (MCU1 and Apollo II S) sending data at the same time to NiceHash by using "stratum+tcp://sha256asicboost.auto.nicehash.com:9200" instead of stratum+tcp://sha256.auto.nicehash.com:9200. However they do appear to be inversely labeled as displayed on the "Hashboards and Pools" page.

Ok thanks I'll try with asicboost and see if there is a difference on MMR.

By the way, anybody able to connect Sparrow to the node? Not sure why it's not connecting now (it was before the new OS). Do I have to put something in particular in bitcoin.conf?