Quote from: fedoralite on April 25, 2014, 08:08:55 PM

Quote from: TauMuon on April 25, 2014, 07:45:03 PM

Quote from: jkoil on April 25, 2014, 07:34:37 PM

Quote from: gimre on April 25, 2014, 04:41:46 AM

Quote from: j23a on April 25, 2014, 03:46:41 AM

Quote from: gimre on April 24, 2014, 08:22:17 PM

BCNxt had great idea, but you're not fair here. Jaguar is much (much) better developer...

How do you know? I hope it's true.

I was decompiling NXT code, when it wasn't published yet, and before the "flawed" 0.4.x sources has been released.
I can tell. Satoshi was coding like in 80+', BCNext, like in 90+' (who knows, maybe to mimic satoshi even more),
Jaguar codes, like you code nowadays.

That being sad, I was and am amazed by the amount of work JeanLuc has done to make the code look decent.

interested in knowing what kind of differences you see between 80+', 90+' and 2000+' coding

Can you give some examples?

I'd be quite interested in this too.

It would be correct ...

examples ... not codes from forthcoming releases