Quote from: icopress on Today at 01:43:07 PM

lies at every turn.

Interesting to read "every turn"
When? After you lied on my face? After this [question]

Quote from: icopress on April 07, 2024, 10:46:24 PM

Btw, Jamber is not a mixer.

If it was a liar then your campaign would not stop. Do you think many of us are blind? Theymos was blind? He perhaps was not informed. In fact, you were misdirecting your campaigners to believe that it was not a mixer. Now following the same, you are misdirecting them, making them believe I am a liar that I was working hard over the past few days to present Jambler a mixer where I was replying your misdirection and having a conversation [two posts, all it was]. You and me may not agree with something but that does not mean I am not right and I lied.

Regarding about the PMs and what was in there, can't you prove it yourself? You can copy the entire PMs and make it public. We all will know the truth. I am sure others who received the PM can see what was sent to them. All will see your public post was enough for everything that happened very quickly.

Quote

[...] BitcoinGirl.Club [...] who have been working hard over the past few days to present Jambler as a mixer [...] all you need to do is update your signature when you receive a PM from me.

To be honest, I would like to know the truth. It's a massive blow [I don't work in groups like you and some others, if I was working in group then after all these years you would not see I have only 1 positive feedback with some neutral. Look at the feedback page of an average user who are not even older than a year. They are able to collect feedback because they know they need it. Without grouping a feedback page will look like the same that I have].

If you can prove that your PM did not have a malicious indicator then I must believe that something is wrong from me and it was very specific or how all these users were so convinced and decided to update their trust list in the same week. Knowing the information, I can have a chance to correct myself [Don't consider that, the trust inclusion or receiving a positive feedback is important for me, I care about my trust and feedback but I don't like the way users give efforts to build up their trust page and DT strength to take benefits from the forum].

Quote from: TryNinja on Today at 03:28:38 PM

I very disagree with your most recent neutral trust feedbacks, so I added you to my ~DT list. That's all.

Quote

A campaign manger who don't really care about forum users, the forum and even his clients. His shrewd argument caused Jambler a reputational damage. He could easily suggest the client to respect forum admin's decision and help them to move on.

That's very interesting. For a neutral feedback you made your conclusion without considering other feedbacks that are left and years of my stay on the forum? When was the last time it happened with a user who was excluded for a neutral feedback or somehow your quick decision was biased? No, I am not asking you to reconsider but ask yourself if you were biased or it happened naturally/neutrally.