Quote from: Charles-Tim on Today at 05:06:18 PM

Quote from: BitcoinGirl.Club on Today at 01:12:22 PM

What really bothers me is how some users thoughtlessly, seemingly without even thinking updated their default trustlist. First openly^[1]and then in PM, icopress told everyone [that are in his campaigns, targeting those who are effected by Jambler's ban] to distrust BitcoinGirl.Club and they did. Why icopress did that? Because he did not like my detailed documentation for his lie on my face and the neutral feedback I left for him & Jambler team

Quote from: icopress on April 07, 2024, 10:46:24 PM

Btw, Jamber is not a mixer.

I think I have missed a lot. Where did icopress openly told people to distrust you? Or you open indirectly told people to distrust you.

I was in Jambler campaign and icopress did not tell me to do anything. I do not believe icopress can even do anything like that. Because some users in Jambler distrust you, do not think icopress send them PM to distruct you. Some people do not think Jambler is a mixer and that you intentionally looked for ways to bring it down and you have succeeded in what could have been helpful for some members on this forum. It is like you alleged that icopress did something, bit if it comes out that it is not true, what trust should we give you? That should deserve a neutral or negative trust.

It looks like icopress supporters are starting to arrive. So you blame bitcoingrils for banning jambler? Where do you and several members get their income from? even though it violates the forum rules?

So what trust should we give you? ignoring forum rules about mixers for personal gain. That should deserve a neutral or negative trust.