I don't see that it is so different because to the 2% of the one time swap you have to add the risk of holding a shitcoin like that, which usually tends to 0.


The second image is illogical. The more bets the more the balance should be equal to the initial one and not a profit. If you are going to claim that this is the result of the simulation, you could put another one that shows losses or make the sample larger (the larger the sample, the more the final balance should tend to the initial one).