Quote from: Kristiyana on Today at 10:20:07 AM

Quote from: siniminomorocomunisakito on Today at 02:42:27 AM

Quote from: Belarge on May 12, 2024, 08:06:03 PM

Bitcoin is never going to zero because it's ranked first when it comes to cryptocurrency, bitcoin going to zero, it changes everything in the market. We have a situation at hand, and finding solution in resolving them shouldn't be a problem. Stocking bitcoin back to back because it's one of the promising patterns to be on the safer side. I know it's compulsory to make impacts on bitcoin, never relents but tends to focused our attention towards our finances and growth.

Very good and you have a nice idea and far ahead by looking at BTC. storing BTC must also be more careful, both seeds and others, and try if you already have BTC, don't tell it to many people. Enough only for yourself because your asset is your safety.

For long-term investment, BTC is not in doubt, it's just that our ability to survive is still in doubt and it is also inevitable and a weakness when unable to maintain it according to the initial story of your entry into the market. Try not to go to memes first if you want to move. Grin

.

Well said ability to survive is still in doubt, investing in bitcoin and holding on to it for Long term investment is not the problem, the problem is If we can still survive till then, sometimes we also need to consider this aspect before making any decision is very important. However I don't look at meme I always avoid them and I can't even advice anyone to invest in meme either, due to the pump and dump that normally occurs in most of this memecoin.

To the extent that I might understand the reference to long-term survival, I don't have any problem with such an idea, yet there are frequently guys who talk about long term survival in ambiguous ways, including putting some kind of timeline on what they consider their own long-term survival to be, which causes me to consider that the member might be considering trading out of bitcoin rather than having have had built up their bitcoin position to such a state that they are no longer concerned about any kind of need to either get back their principle and/or to specifically calculate their BTC profits because in some sense a long term position in bitcoin may actually result in an ability to mostly be retaining bitcoin holdings forever and merely shaving off some coins here and there along the way, but mostly living off of various other cashflows and mostly spending the BTC last in terms of potential various sources of cashflow that might be available.

Regarding meme coins, various other shitcoins (which means digital asset products that are not meaningfully related to bitcoin) and/or trading (or gambling), any of us should be attempting to exercise a decent amount of skepticism and conservatism in regards to how much of our value (time and/or energies) that we are putting into those kinds of matters, and generally I suggest no more than 10% of the size of your bitcoin stash for any of that kind of stuff and perhaps even a combination of all of those related non-bitcoin distractions. At the same time, forum members have the discretion and rights to do whatever they like, including dumb things, and maybe those dumb things will work out favorably for them (which is kind of the nature of gambling) and maybe not. In other words, there tends to be a decent amount of value that comes from building BTC holdings in relatively conservative and/or certain ways rather than taking too many chances,

yet surely folks are going to have some gambling tendencies, and so I am not suggesting to completely give up on their gambling tendencies, even though I would suggest there would be a quite a bit of value to limit their gambling tendencies to less than 10% of the size of their bitcoin holdings, and sure if they figure out some systems in which they conclude that it is reasonable, prudent and potentially advantageous for them to go beyond the 10%, then surely that is on them, and surely there could be some situations in which that might be the right move, even from a prudence and conservative stand point, and in that regard, we each have our own brains, and some times we might come across situations in which it may well be a good idea to venture a bit into some more risky behaviors for a period of time, and keeping our eyes open to the various trade-offs related to the pursuit of those kinds of avenues.

Quote from: Freddie Boyer on Today at 11:34:44 AM

Quote from: Makus on May 02, 2024, 08:28:03 AM

Sure mate, like I said earlier, when I started this thread I was a bit of a novice who had only little experience or idea in the crypto network, but as of today, I know the importance of security and the penalties that follows if you disregard any caution in safe guarding your mnemonic seed. I'm currently using an electrum wallet to store my Bitcoins but when it gets to a certain level I'll consider the use of a hardware wallet.

For the ranking, it may not be one measure that we are already proficient in the crypto world but the honesty of the conditions that make us acceptable in conveying our investment conditions in order to end well.

Part of the problem when any other forum member mentions some vague concept of "crypto," and then they might mention that they are somehow relating that to bitcoin, yet the next member who mentions "crypto" does not really connect the idea to bitcoin, so then it can become quite unclear regarding what the fuck they are talking about.

Are we still talking about bitcoin or not, and if so, then why not use the word bitcoin rather than crypto, and if you feel some kind of need to use the term crypto, at least if you can describe what you are talking about.. otherwise it hardly makes any sense to be using such term because really there is no such thing as "crypto world".. that is a bunch of nonsense, unless you say bitcoin and shitcoins and you suggest that to be crypto world.

Yeah, sure people are using the term "crypto" all the time, even smart people and legislators and they also have some other phrases that they use, such as "digital assets," yet there also can be times in which the vague and dumbass phrases are used, but in legislation, for example, the terms will frequently be defined, even though surely in a lot of the more recent legislation efforts, there seems to be a lot of attacks on bitcoin, so in some sense some of the vagueness in the use of language and the convolution of terms ends up in itself being an additional attack on bitcoin in terms of both vagueness of laws that are being proposed and passed and also overly broadness of the laws, which tends to trounce upon various individual rights that people (and businesses) will likely have, yet such "rights" will vary around the world in terms of how rights are articulated and/or respected.. which sometimes is not very much when one group is trying to control another group, and when there are concerns about individuals having too much financial sovereignty and/or privacy.

Quote from: Freddie Boyer on Today at 11:34:44 AM

Yes, I am also like you taking it little by little part-time studying market patterns and trends to date and in this forum there are quite a lot of references that I can read from several posts that discuss market price issues where it really helps in addition to getting DCA-style ivest patterns in buying BTC the discussion is also quite long and wide.

At least in this second paragraph, you were able to bring your conversation back to more concrete ideas, which may well suggest that your earlier dumb-ass, vague, ambiguous and potentially misleading reference to "crypto" might have mostly been about bitcoin, even though perhaps you chose to use the term "crypto" because you wanted to appear smarter and more sophisticated, which for me (and perhaps some others) contributes to a sense of less smart to be using such a vague term that may well include bitcoin as part of what you are wanting to talk about, but you seemed to have had not wanted to use the word bitcoin in that earlier word choice/description that you were making.