Quote from: holydarkness on Today at 04:34:18 PM

Quote from: Rating Place on May 13, 2024, 05:19:06 PM

Quote from: DGUDGUDGU on May 13, 2024, 02:32:00 PM

Quote from: holydarkness on May 12, 2024, 05:59:42 PM

Do you mind to provide them to an arbitrator, though? They can keep those evidence related to your algorithm private, just for the arbitrator's eyes, which they'll use to verify and validate your counter-accusation.

OP, suppose the casino are willing to get it escalated to an arbitrator, please choose one and stick to that one only. If you both agreed to a mediator, their findings and ruling will be considered final and bindings to both parties and you two should honor their decision.

That is fine by me, I'm willing to go along with that.

To make it easy, do you use bots? In a case like this that is normally the claim, electronic means.

edit, I hope that the OP isn't using a bot.

Umm... a tad bit curious and bemused, how exactly do you expect OP [or anyone else] to answer this?

The answer will most likely always a "no", even if someone actually did use bot. They fully aware that the usage of automated service is against the platform's rule, I don't think someone will admit such violation and dig their own grave.

Wouldn't it be easier and more transparent to analyze OP's betting history and rely on your analysis whether OP used bot or not instead of asking him that?

You are 100% right. He’s using Pinnacle and Bet365 so he’s probably just a value bettor. Sportsbet.one needs to prove he’s using a bot or pay him. The only thing that bothers me is that the OP is smarter than he’s portraying. He understands bot betting.