Quote from: BitcoinGirl.Club on Today at 09:26:43 PM

Quote from: holydarkness on May 13, 2024, 10:43:04 AM

Ahh, my apology for the confusion. I was not trying to say that they're different things [at least far as I know]. My post was intended to convey a message that there are several elements of these decentralized casinos that's still centralized [as explained further in paragraph 2]. If I may revise my first sentence, it would look like this,

"I don't think calling a web3 [decentralized] casinos as a decentralized casino is true to its core as in in a verbatim or extremely literal way, and can not be taken literally as a decentralized system, like dex exchange [forkdelta].They're more like a semi-anonymous casino, where player does not need to provide ID and can conveniently connect through wallets.
[...]"

It ensures I was not wrong 😂. I thought I messed up LOL
It's more clear now.

Quote from: holydarkness on May 13, 2024, 10:43:04 AM

Do you mind to provide them to an arbitrator, though? They can keep those evidence related to your algorithm private, just for the arbitrator's eyes, which they'll use to verify and validate your counter-accusation.

Per my knowledge when a sportsbook ban or penalty an account, it's not the sportsbook itself but the sportsbook provider who order the penalty. The sportsbook only response to it. I think it will be more easier for Sportbet.one to allow the arbitrator to communicate with their sportsbook provider.

Betting history from one sportsbook is not going to help to make a conclusion.

/*edited*/

Limits can be set by the odds provider or the book. The book can also override the provider. When it's set by the odds provider, then the player has that limit set at every book using that provider. That information doesn't tell you if a player is using a bot. By looking at bet history, at times it's very clear if a player is using a bot or not.