Quote from: holydarkness on Today at 10:00:28 AM

Quote from: Rating Place on May 20, 2024, 07:07:44 PM

Quote from: Mahdirakib on May 20, 2024, 02:12:00 PM

Quote from: Rating Place on May 20, 2024, 10:33:23 AM

But this has to be caught ahead of time. If not, the player is in a lose lose situation.

As I have said before, the odds provider do some cross check before identifying an abuser. They won't caught anyone without having enough evidences.

Quote

Imagine if this happened to you. You are playing at Stake and get banned. So you move over to Sportsbet and make a huge wager and win. Sportsbet can’t come back and grab your winnings saying that you were an abuser at Stake.

It isn't about Stake and Sportsbet. Both of them have different odds provider. So, their actions will be individual. Now think yourself in the odds provider position. You are providing odds to FortuneJack, BCgame, Rollbit, Roobet, DuckDice, etc sportsbooks. Someone has taken benefits and abused your provided odds in any of those betting sites, then got limited or blocked. Will you consider him as an innocent person on a different sportsbook where you are providing odds?

Quote

I’ve never heard that happen in my life unless there is some type of clause about a sister book.

Seems like you aren't looking all around. It is common for the sportsbook to follow the investigation of odds provider, and to cooperate with the odds provider. Anyway, I'm not interested in having a long discussion about this.

Quote from: DuckDice.io on May 20, 2024, 12:56:15 PM

hey mate, let me sort this out for you, first of all can you please double check your username? i can't find a user with Ykavyvu776 maybe it was changed?

It was a typo by the OP. His actual username is Ykavyvu766, which can be seen in the screenshot or the chat log.

Players don't know which books use the same provider, they can't guess. Agree that Books follow and share the same info. They shared way before the Internet. But name one case where a player had money confiscated for something done at another book? The same question for holtdarkness, name one case? It's never been done without court order.

From the top of my head I have nothing, and most likely there won't be any case as such; where a casino confiscate player's money for their previous abuse on other casino or their own casino. I think I've mentioned this somewhere on other threads, casinos are not interested to make themselves rich by "stealing" player's fund... well, at least reputable casinos.

They'll refund player's initial deposit if the player is at loss. If they're in overall profit though, yes, funds in their account will be confiscated to cover these profit made from the abusive bets.

Likewise, this is also what happened to OP. Let's suppose duckdice's further investigation yield the same result, that they can't revoke the decision made and OP still got his winning voided, his fund are not being confiscated for things done in other books, they returned his fund.

that’s never happened either. Winnings have never been voided because of something that happened at another book. This would be a first.