Quote from: holydarkness on Today at 04:25:36 PM

Quote from: Rating Place on Today at 03:41:25 PM

Odds Provider means odds provider, that’s it. Just go to the Betsby or OddsMatrix and read what services they provide.

I am not sure I get the point you're trying to convey with this. Is it that odds provider provide well... services of odds and that's that? They don't dwell in abuse detection and other things alike? It'll be nice if you can rephrase so I can understand better, or perhaps just explain to us what odds provider do and what they provide?

Quote from: Rating Place on Today at 03:41:25 PM

I’ve read your examples, the book isn’t a middleman. The Betcoin case isn’t similar. You have to first understand what an Odds Provider is before making any judgements on this case.

The communications between Betcoin and competitors are to better the industry as a whole. It’s a cat and mouse game.

Thus, in other words, a ban due to violation happened on other casino can carry to other? Since they communicate with each other?

Quote from: Rating Place on Today at 03:41:25 PM

When I don’t know what I’m doing or see someone better, I step down. That’s why I asked you to take over the accusation list. I could see that you were a lot better. Sportsbooks are my arena.

So tell us, in short, as you seemingly missed that question, can you point us out to the statement where providers' decision to ban an account does not carry over to other casino?

You are looking at it backwards again as in guilty until proven innocent. Show me one case where it has carried over. This would be insane. You are putting way too much authority in an Odds Provider. The whole dispute is between book and player. The book is using evidence from the Odds Provider.