...
Today, we have decided to invite Albania and Croatia to begin accession talks to join our Alliance.
...
...
Today, we have decided to invite Albania and Croatia to begin accession talks to join our Alliance.
...
...
It all has to come from the country. The invitation to talks is only after a country expresses interest previously. You have never proven anything except that you confuse facts an opinion... curiously always favouring your narrative.
There has not been any NATO aggression to Ruzzia. If Ukraine has shown interest in joining NATO, they are invited to discuss how and when. It is very simple - NATO is not an aggressive alliance.
...
Haha yes they just give out cookies, right? and we all totally believe that!
NATO Chief Backs Use of Western Weapons to Hit Russian Targets
Chief of a "not aggressive alliance" promotes its members sending weapons to a country, which is not part of the alliance,
[...]
Correct, NATO is a defensive alliance. NATO is not attacking Ruzzia.
You are giving yourself the answer, NATO is not belligerent in this war and none of the countries that sell weapons to Ukraine are belligerent in the war. They can sell weapons to Ukraine and they could sell them to Ruzzia if they wanted to. Ukraine can use the weapons as they see fit.
What surprises me is that anyone has to actually say that it is OK for Ukraine to attack Ruzzia, just as Ruzzia is attacking Ukraine. Is super-funny you somehow find that unfair
In my view, there is not even a need for anyone to "give permission" - Ukraine is at war with Ruzzia, all military targets are exactly that -targets. And if it is a multi-million radar critical for the Ruzzian strategic defence... well, just withdraw from Ukraine if you cannot handle this loses. I am sure it was much more fun from your side when the missiles were flying only from east to west, was it not? Karma is a bitch, uh?Just as I am sure than pacific countries such as Iran and China do not put any limits on what Ruzzia decides to use their weapons for - literally, no limits whatsoever.
So... Finland and Sweden are in NATO for the cookies? So none of this countries in your map are in talks are there because the are scared Ruzzia could invade them, just like it did with Ukraine? You are getting funnier by the minute.
The only point here is that Putin thinks he is somehow entitled to dictate in the old USSR, the neighbours know, and they like it not. Comme'on Putin has done more for NATO expansion than anyone else... NATO was nearly dead before the invasion.
Are there many defensive alliances that attack other countries first like when NATO attacked Yugoslavia? I'm sure China would love such precedence.
Attack is defense. War Is Peace. Freedom Is Slavery. Ignorance Is Strength
You know pretty well that Ukraine cannot use the weapons as they see fit, just ask Biden. You also know the reason, that Ukraine is provided weapons not to win but just not loose too fast. For some reason Ukrainian leadership was happy to accept that role for their citizens, and now they're living with those consequences. If US really wanted Ukraine to win there are million things that would've done differently, it was obvious to everyone from the start. Instead you'll maybe get only few F16s this year to slow down the losses and drag it out for a bit longer.