Quote from: dkbit98 on May 27, 2024, 07:06:37 PM

No it's not a mixer, and there is no anything centralized that could control transactions.

According to theymos' definition, that may be the case. But, in my understanding, if a tool is utilized for coin mixing, it qualifies as a mixer. And if it lacks a central point of failure, it can be considered a decentralized mixer.

Quote from: dkbit98 on May 27, 2024, 07:06:37 PM

You invented your own definition of mixer that is not corresponding to reality.

Really? Then what term would you use for a protocol that mixes your inputs? A "joiner"? Cheesy

If mixing is the activity, then the mixer is the entity performing it.