Quote from: DaRude on Today at 06:53:52 PM

Quote from: Branko on Today at 06:22:50 PM

Quote from: paxmao on Today at 06:11:32 PM

You were arguing that what I post is propaganda. I just wanted to show you what can be classed as such (despite not being necessarily a lie) and how easy is to find it so you may notice the difference. I can see you are starting to get the difference between "war porn", "cheering", "propaganda" and information that is relevant. One more example to see if you can find the seven differences:

This is a very real cost of keeping the war ongoing. In the years before, all the cost and all the infrastructure destruction was on Ukraine. Missiles flying only East to West. Now missiles (& drones) are also flying West to East. This is factual information, with a high degree of credibility and it is of strategic importance for the war:

This is the network of radars that Ruzzia uses to detect incoming ballistic threats. All short of threats (I am going to leave to you to figure out what "detection", "ballistic" and "incoming threats" mean).

Over a single week, Ukraine has damaged two of these (along with a few airframes). These are not just simple anti-air radars. They are building size and they will take a long time to repair or replace.

Why does this matter?

a) direct effect in "strategic blindness".

b) An economic effect in the war calculus: from we hurt Ukraine and it is "free" to, hey they can and will hit in stuff that hurts (that started with the Moscova BTW).

See, this is not propaganda, no tweets, no same thing...

Those radars are insignificant for current war, which is another sign that attacks are directed by UK/USA and probably preparation for nuclear assault on Russia
They serve as early warning against intercontinental ballistic missiles
Now, imagine if attack on such objects get falsely flagged as nuclear attack and Russia responds nuking England, how would you like it?

https://www.yahoo.com/news/ukrainian-strike-russian-nuclear-radar-163845828.html

“Not a wise decision on the part of Ukraine,” said Hans Kristensen, a nuclear arsenal expert at the Federation of American Scientists. “Bombers and military sites in general are different because they’re used to attack Ukraine.”

Thord Are Iversen, a Norwegian military analyst, said striking a part of Russia’s nuclear-warning system was “not a particularly good idea… especially in times of tension.”

“It’s in everyone’s best interest that Russia’s ballistic missile warning system works well,” he said.

Seriously paxmao, you're now happy about attacks on ballistic missile early warning system? Are things already that bad that you're cheering for a global nuclear annihilation?

Oh, don't be so hard on paxmao. I should be gentler with him, too. He's simply cheering a 'football team' on, while most of what he says is designed to antagonize people who don't agree with him, simply because they don't agree with him... not because he wants the war. He knows perfectly well that his 'team' has lost, and he is simply shedding tears for the losses.

The thing that he doesn't seem to realize is that the fact of his team even fighting has literally killed and maimed hundreds of thousands of them, and maybe of the opposing 'team' as well. I find it hard to believe that he actually wanted all those deaths to have happened.

Whatever the true number of casualties in this war - https://duckduckgo.com/?q=casualties+of+the+Ukraine+war&ia=web - nobody except the US government war machine and the heads of the big banks want it. This is what they have been after since they backed the Bolshevik Revolution in Russia over 100 years ago - https://duckduckgo.com/?q=who+financed+the+bolsheviks%3F&ia=web. And they are losing this war just like they lost the Bolshevik Revolution.

Cool